Fnights Posted February 25, 2014 Report Share Posted February 25, 2014 There is no devs. If there was a single programmer on the utorrent team then it would have been miles better then it is now. Remove the ads and make it open source so I can help fix this broken ad-ridden program. I agree with you, open or partial source is the best way to fix issues and improve this tool thanks to the help of the community. Sad i can't remove the facebook/twitter icons, utorrent was a great tool but release after release become more and more heavy and memory drain.Like firefox, it was a great browser and more the time pass more it sucks, this happen when you stop listen the community and your tool become too popular. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbildman Posted February 26, 2014 Report Share Posted February 26, 2014 Getting this with 3.4 stable, and did not have this problem before:: not authroized; don't hammer this tracker with multiple announcements for a torrent Any help? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted February 26, 2014 Report Share Posted February 26, 2014 don't hammer this tracker with multiple announcements for a torrent ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbildman Posted February 26, 2014 Report Share Posted February 26, 2014 About hammer and multiple announcements...this was not a problem with my previous version, and when I replace the 3.4 stable with 3.2, the issue goes away. So, what is going on with multiple announcements??? And why do previous versions not show this for some private torrent sites?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted February 26, 2014 Report Share Posted February 26, 2014 a BUG? You should post your torrent and trackers' list . The design is to avoid multiple announce even if the tracker is listed in there more then once. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archlinux Posted February 27, 2014 Report Share Posted February 27, 2014 I see, so the devs work for free... You just need to pay attention, and skip/remove whatever ad you don't like. What a lamest excuse ever. I missed the part where they died of hunger all these years to force them put in Facebook icons in order to survive. You're seriously starting to lose all your credibility, rafi. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted February 27, 2014 Report Share Posted February 27, 2014 Oh.. starting to loose it? *all* of it ? seriously? ... I am entitled to my opinion as you are to yours. Too bad you probably didn't get it: "free" was used to just make a point.. 99% of the ads are user disable-able. People should learn to do that if they want to. True, those "sticky" icons are an exception now. I don't like it, but overall it is a minor non-showstopper thing that I can live with... If you cannot - use another client. If this makes me less credible for you - so be it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
byzona Posted February 27, 2014 Report Share Posted February 27, 2014 delete this please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beasly Posted February 27, 2014 Report Share Posted February 27, 2014 99% of the ads are user disable-able. People should learn to do that if they want to.The answer is not that most of the extra crap is optional at installation....It's why does Bittorrent Inc. have any association with this crap in the first place....If it's for monetary reasons then it's time for a big revaluation because in the long run it will only hurt your popularity...Sure you have millions {novice and tech savy users} but don't think for once that this stat is forever and is dwindling as we speak....Novice users do tend to somewhat catch up with experience.I'm sure the devs have a way of monitoring how many use Utorrent...Watch it carefully and don't think that if you have millions of users that you can afford to lose a few thousand in short periods of time. Conduit:It is malware, a browser hijacker. It has spyware elements, but it is not spyware. Hijackers are more similar to adware : the information they collect are for marketing and advertisement purposes usually. Are they dangerous? well, their search results are poor and advertisements might include more serious malware.Spigot {searchprotection.exe}:The industry generally refers to it as a “PUP,” or potentially unwanted program.The PUP.Optional.Spigot.A infection is used to boost advertising revenue. PUP.Optional.Spigot.A it’s technically not a virus, but it does exhibit plenty of malicious traits, such as rootkit capabilities to hook deep into the operating system, browser hijacking, and in general just interfering with the user experience.Utorrent.inspsearch.com:Utorrent.inspsearch.com redirect is classified as browser hijacker, which is compatible with Internet Explorer, Google Chrome and Mozilla Firefox. Once in, Utorrent.inspsearch.com redirect modifies the internet browser settings including homepage and default search engine as well as create Utorrent.inspsearch.com associated add-ons. Once infected by Utorrent.inspsearch.com, you may find tons of advertisements appearing on your computer screen. Furthermore, these advertisements are related to your recent search. It seems that Utorrent.inspsearch.com know what you are interested in. as a matter of fact, Utorrent.inspsearch.com is responsible for collecting your search queries, recording your browsing habits and assembling your personal information. etc., etc... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TecnoBoy Posted February 27, 2014 Report Share Posted February 27, 2014 I can understand that the new Peer Priority is made to reduce internet traffic worlwide, trying to connect to closer peers but it may limit download speed a lot for some countries!For example I live in Italy and here (at least) 80% of users have ADSL with 0,50 or 1 Mbit in upload.In fact Italian torrents are usually slow, while whenever I download an english-language torrent I can get faster speeds, thanks to other countries with FTTH connections So slow-countries will download always SLOWER? I hate the idea that my client will reject FTTH peers and connect to italian ADSLs... Looks like Peer Priority mainly affects peers when max connection numbers is reached, right?So usually will connect to everyone like always.. Anyway I'm not going to upgrade to 3.4.0 for now! :\ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zarggg Posted February 27, 2014 Report Share Posted February 27, 2014 I think you're over-reacting to the intent of the feature. Also, it only applies to uTorrent clients that have this feature, so connections to any other clients will be unaffected unless they adopt the same protocol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted February 27, 2014 Report Share Posted February 27, 2014 I am not sure this is the case. might be independent from other clients . And yes, as long as you are below you max # of peers - I think it will be exactly the same as today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TecnoBoy Posted February 27, 2014 Report Share Posted February 27, 2014 It would be nice to find an option to disable this Peer Priority into Settings->Advanced (it there isn't already). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delfinok Posted February 27, 2014 Report Share Posted February 27, 2014 I don't get it.Does label-directory mapping work? I can't get it to work for custom labels... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted February 28, 2014 Report Share Posted February 28, 2014 Yes, but possibly only when using the "add-torrent" dialogue. for some reason. Post a screenshot of your filter(s). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
conquerist Posted March 2, 2014 Report Share Posted March 2, 2014 So slow-countries will download always SLOWER? I hate the idea that my client will reject FTTH peers and connect to italian ADSLs... Incorrect. The actual priority in canocial peer priority is, for all intents and purposes, random. There's no preference for IP addresses more similar to your own. There's no preference for IP addresses closer to you or located in your own country. It may not seem intuitive, but the actual priority matters little. The key is that all clients agree on the same priority. Paraphrasing from [1], the problem with "classical" BitTorrent is that clients only accept the first 50 clients[2] that connect to it and after that will not accept new incoming connections. Now, If a new peer now joins the swarm, it won't be able to connect to the old swarm members that have all 50 slots used up. With a canonical peer priority, the 50 slots are allocated to peers with the highest priority, rather than first-come-first-served. Each pair of IPs is assigned an agreed upon, but essentially random, priority.[3] The newcomer will, by chance, have a high priority for some of the existing swarm members, so these existing swarm members will kick a lower-priority peer off one of the 50 slots and allow the newcomer to connect. [1] Article explaining the concept: http://blog.libtorrent.org/2012/12/swarm-connectivity/[2] In uTorrent this value is set by "Maximum number of connected peers per torrent".[3] Formal specification BEP40: http://www.bittorrent.org/beps/bep_0040.html tl;dr: Canonical peer priorities are random but agreed upon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delfinok Posted March 2, 2014 Report Share Posted March 2, 2014 Actually, there's nothing unusual in my filters. Just the label name and directory.On the add torrent dialogue i just select the corresponding label, but the directory remains default Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pfc_J Posted March 2, 2014 Report Share Posted March 2, 2014 No. Seriously? Can't turn off/remove the social media icons in 3.4? I know you said thats not a show stopper for you rafi but I just want to say that it is for me. Total deal breaker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted March 2, 2014 Report Share Posted March 2, 2014 Seriously. I don't remember we ever signed on any "deal" with BT... but it's a free country/Internet, you are free to go... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted March 2, 2014 Report Share Posted March 2, 2014 Actually, there's nothing unusual in my filters. Just the label name and directory.On the add torrent dialogue i just select the corresponding label, but the directory remains defaultSadly, it doesn't work so. It goes: match-filter-to-name ->auto-select-path-in-dialogeThey did not cover two cases:1. auto-select path simply when you select a label in that dialog2. auto-set path when not using the dialogue at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beasly Posted March 2, 2014 Report Share Posted March 2, 2014 Why are our 3 friends always listed... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owen Smith Posted March 3, 2014 Report Share Posted March 3, 2014 uTorrent 3.4 doesn't use the alternate upload rate when not downloading. It's stuck resolutely on 50 kbps my standard upload rate, but it should have switched to 60 since I'm not downloading. It's been running over 12 hours now, I wondered if it was a DHT startup thing but clearly not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted March 3, 2014 Report Share Posted March 3, 2014 See tip # P in my guide... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oedipussrox Posted March 4, 2014 Report Share Posted March 4, 2014 utorrent 3.4 does not finish bandwidith test. Tried 3 other versions (previous settings were purged before installs) Running Windows 8.1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poutsolini Posted March 4, 2014 Report Share Posted March 4, 2014 the new version 3.4 and latest beta wont work on my AMD 3200 XP computersI have 2 of them. one on win7 the ohter on XPi tried the latest builds and the same problem, everytime I try to install 3.4 it crashes. I try all the new builds as they come out including Beta,I don't understand why such small program would need special chipset commands in order to work.There are hunderds of thousands of AMD pcs out there and they are not ready to be junked.Its a real pain that developers don't seem to care. There is all kinds of new software that wont work on these older pc'sThe funny thing is these older pc's can run email, do torrents and browse the web withotut a need to upgrade to a new i7 quad core lolDo I need to junk my pc every 10 years to do torrents?Please fix this issuethankks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.