tps18489 Posted November 19, 2005 Report Share Posted November 19, 2005 Hello guys. May I know what are the best settings for maximum number of connected peers per torrent and global maximum number of connections for uTorrent? I put 80/400. Is it okay? My download speed is 1Mbps while my upload is 384Kbps. Thanks a lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firon Posted November 19, 2005 Report Share Posted November 19, 2005 That's a good place to start, experiment with this value to see what works best for you. Most likely lowering will have a positive effect. Try using 4 upload slots and throttle your upload to say, 36 or so, and also experiment with lowering/raising this value. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frostmourne Posted November 19, 2005 Report Share Posted November 19, 2005 I have 384Kbps as upload as well, and use 384 for global and 115 per torrent. I use a max upload of 38. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tobeon Posted November 19, 2005 Report Share Posted November 19, 2005 Other than start a new topic for a near enough the same question,I have a 400/80 MAX/PerTorrent 'Maximum connection' set, and I have unlocked my halfopenconnections to 275. My halfopen connections in advanced settings are set to 100. Are these good values for a 240kbps down, 29kbps up connection? Any opinions would be appreciated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firon Posted November 19, 2005 Report Share Posted November 19, 2005 You shouldn't really set halfopen above 50. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Animorc Posted November 19, 2005 Report Share Posted November 19, 2005 He did patch it. And this number doesn't matter when it comes to speed AFAIK, it only allows connecting to peers faster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firon Posted November 19, 2005 Report Share Posted November 19, 2005 Well, if you set your value above or equal to the half-open connection limit, you'll completely stall your internet connection until the queue finishes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Animorc Posted November 19, 2005 Report Share Posted November 19, 2005 But he said he set it to 275. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firon Posted November 19, 2005 Report Share Posted November 19, 2005 That's why I edited my post earlier. Regardless, setting it to above 50 still isn't a good idea (might cause problems with a crummy router/modem) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User61 Posted November 20, 2005 Report Share Posted November 20, 2005 This is a bit OT but what is a good router/modem brand and model. I have one that doesn't cope very well with two person sharing a 1Mbps/384kbps connection (both using BT). Web surfing is thoroughly a pain in the ass sometimes. Does a dedicated Linux PC acting as a router with the router modem acting as modem only be (much) better? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hendrix Posted November 20, 2005 Report Share Posted November 20, 2005 dlink di-604 .. cheap and works (mostly) ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firon Posted November 20, 2005 Report Share Posted November 20, 2005 WRT54G/GS with the HyperWRT firmware.Except for the latest hardware revision. (V5 and V4 respectively). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColdArmor Posted November 20, 2005 Report Share Posted November 20, 2005 I would use like 300 for 1mbps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r00ted Posted November 21, 2005 Report Share Posted November 21, 2005 Mainline client uses only 45 (or is it 55?) max connections, per torrent. And well, more connections doesn't always mean faster speeds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Osjur Posted November 23, 2005 Report Share Posted November 23, 2005 Well firstly window has a limit to how many TCP connections you can have open at a same time: It's 10, so if you set your half-open connections to like 50 or more it still connects only 10 TCP connections at a same time (correct me if wrong).Secondly: for 1024/384 connection you should have about 130-160 connections per task and 4 upload slots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted November 23, 2005 Report Share Posted November 23, 2005 Well firstly window has a limit to how many TCP connections you can have open at a same time: It's 10, so if you set your half-open connections to like 50 or more it still connects only 10 TCP connections at a same time (correct me if wrong).U r wrong ! this limitation is only in XP SP2, it is a *rate* of 10 connections per second and this rate can also be inreased using special patch ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaosblade Posted November 24, 2005 Report Share Posted November 24, 2005 And you are also wrong, I believe ;]Time doesnt matter, you can only have 10 half-open connections on an unpatched install, no matter how much time passes. The rest of the connections get queued and wait for the others to finish their business (either fully connect or drop). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted November 25, 2005 Report Share Posted November 25, 2005 Well, you are probably right... not concurrent "TCP connections" as Osjur have explained, but half-open connections (SYN) as you have correctly noted. If the timeout for those is - by any chance - 1 sec., it might limit you to a max. rate of establishing 10 TCP connections to 10 peers per second... Anyway, it is better (for uT) to increase this... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firon Posted November 25, 2005 Report Share Posted November 25, 2005 8 is the 'safe limit' to avoid problems with XP SP2 systems, and crappy modems/routers/etc that can't handle making lots of connections at once.You raise it at your own risk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted November 25, 2005 Report Share Posted November 25, 2005 Really OK, I'm staying with good old Win 98 ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firon Posted November 25, 2005 Report Share Posted November 25, 2005 It's only applicable to Service Pack 2, and there's a patcher out there to raise the connection attempt limit. Remember, this is connection ATTEMPTS, not max number of connections!Windows 2003 sets it to 50 by default, and the patcher works for it too.Windows 98 however, limits you to 100 TOTAL connections, unless you set a registry key. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted November 25, 2005 Report Share Posted November 25, 2005 Windows 98 however, limits you to 100 TOTAL connections, unless you set a registry key. I know, I already "patched" it... The problem is that it seems like the (undocumented) maximum possible is around 400-450 ... do you happen to know of any way to get arround that ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firon Posted November 25, 2005 Report Share Posted November 25, 2005 I don't know of a way to get around it, sorry... though, you shouldn't really -need- 400 on BitTorrent, unless you got like a 10mbit pipe. The actual maximum is 512. It's a hardcoded limit, you can't get past that any way apparently. :/HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\VxD\MSTCPMaxConnectionsValue Type: StringValue: 512 TcpTimedWaitDelayValue Type: StringValue: 60 this one makes it drop connections in the TIME_WAIT status (closed connection) after 60 seconds, instead of waiting 4 minutes. It should help greatly in dealing with the connection limit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted November 25, 2005 Report Share Posted November 25, 2005 10x Firon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.