insanitysnake Posted July 21, 2008 Report Share Posted July 21, 2008 Hi all!Administrators, and Developers, Please Read!The Initial-Seeding of uTorrent since birth is not the best, this is evidenced in the performance of other programs torrent that there are good before I respectfully request that the developers of uTorrent that redoing the system Initial-Seeding, which is really bad, uTorrent in the average'm up +150% to a file> 1GB complete by the end planted, and in BitTornado, just 105% or less than that for the torrent is fully planted, this is a difference and so, like other of uTorrent, but as I am dedicated to launch seeder, abandoned the uTorrent solely because of this problem, with the remaining program is perfect, does not leave anything to be desired ...So I hope that the developers of utorrent finally rebuild the algoritimo of Initial-Seeding, so it will be perfect ... Each byte sent is the best sown, and obviously fast, as is the BitTornado ...Thank you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultima Posted July 22, 2008 Report Share Posted July 22, 2008 That's like saying "µTorrent's crashing. Fix it." Makes it difficult to consider if you don't even provide some basic information -- like what version of µTorrent you're using. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firon Posted July 22, 2008 Report Share Posted July 22, 2008 Nah, superseeding in utorrent does kinda suck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
insanitysnake Posted July 22, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 22, 2008 Sorry, for my bad english, i have suggestion and Firon say "down words" i'm surprised, uTorrent leading world traffic and not accept opinion for users...Sorry, but a waiting thepiratebay software to complete abandon utorrent to share my files...Thanks for reply and have a good day Firon... You're The Best! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultima Posted July 22, 2008 Report Share Posted July 22, 2008 I'm not seeing this non-acceptance of user opinion you speak of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hermanm Posted July 22, 2008 Report Share Posted July 22, 2008 > Nah, superseeding in utorrent does kinda suck.Thanks for clarifying. I was wondering too! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firon Posted July 22, 2008 Report Share Posted July 22, 2008 We'll probably address it in a future release, but the priority isn't too high at the moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thelittlefire Posted July 22, 2008 Report Share Posted July 22, 2008 ... how does it differ from BitTornado? Initial-seeding in uTorrent starts at piece #1 and continues to the end until each ratio has been obtained. It then recycles to the beginning.... how is this wasteful? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Switeck Posted July 22, 2008 Report Share Posted July 22, 2008 uTorrent probably isn't giving up on "dud" peers that refuse to share the piece sent to it.BitTornado does, so BitTornado isn't feeding the same leechy peer multiple pieces that it won't reciprocate with other peers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
insanitysnake Posted July 22, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 22, 2008 the fact is, the bittornado is much faster than utorrent situation in the super-seed, who now works as the system of them I can not say because I am not a programmer, but for what I believe can tell noted that the distribution of pieces is much more efficient with the bittornado, I think it sends several pieces at the same time for each peer, never sending the same as it has already sent or are sending get someone, and so I think it should work!and thanks for the response of other members of this forum, they know this fact for me and for many it is a priority because it has no explanation I use another program torrent only because of this ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hermanm Posted July 22, 2008 Report Share Posted July 22, 2008 > uTorrent probably isn't giving up on "dud" peers that refuse to share the piece sent to it.Is there a good reason for not being strict on sharing pieces? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Switeck Posted July 22, 2008 Report Share Posted July 22, 2008 Reasons to be strict with sharing pieces:BitLeech and similar programs, poorly-configured clients running many torrents at once, monthly download/upload quotas.Otherwise, why not just use regular seeding? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
streetstopper Posted October 29, 2008 Report Share Posted October 29, 2008 i have always wondered if there was a problem as regards utorrent's initial-seeding/super seeding.it always closes its connections on peers.using 1.8.1 build 12639 now.no problem with normal seeding though.using bittornado for super seeding instead.but if it's regular downloading, it's utorrent.TY firon for the clarification! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firon Posted October 31, 2008 Report Share Posted October 31, 2008 The problem with utorrent's initial seeding is that it's neither highly efficient nor very fast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.