µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

war59312 · 2010-02-23 19:16:08

"Seed while" stops .001% early it seems.

For example if I have it set to 100% then it stops at .999%.

Silass · 2010-02-23 22:08:53

Mine hangs after a few hours of the application being open then when i try to close it brings up the not responding prompt

Using windows 7 64bit reinstalled it 4 days ago on a decent I7 system

daifuku · 2010-02-24 00:18:42

I also encountered the same problem experienced by Silass on my Windows 7 64bit system:

Whenever I tried to stop a torrent which had been running for a while, uTorrent would hang and fail to respond to any command. This bug is reproducible...

rafi · 2010-02-24 07:47:37

what your % CPU that uTorrent takes ? is the speedgraph visible at that time ?

tapin13 · 2010-02-24 10:46:42

download and start testing! Thanks!

Firon · 2010-02-24 12:40:29

war59312 wrote:

"Seed while" stops .001% early it seems.
For example if I have it set to 100% then it stops at .999%.

It's because uploading happens in 16kb chunks, so due to a rounding error it stops at .999. I'm fairly certain uT rounds down, too.

Virtual_ManPL · 2010-02-24 12:45:48

bloatware graph introduced in 2.0.1 or its just me ?

µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18284
CPU use - about 21% LOL, W00T

µTorrent 2.0 18296
CPU use - about 2%

PC Specs:
C2D E6550 2,33GHz @ 3,5GHz

also 2.0.1 have laggy menus when you select torrents with mouse, with graph in background

rafi · 2010-02-24 12:52:42

see bug #2 here : http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php … 60#p457060

Firon · 2010-02-24 12:55:44

Yer, it's the transparent legend. It's gonna be disabled by default on the next build. For now, just disable gui.transparent_graph_legend

rafi · 2010-02-24 13:03:05

but... but... I want it fixed ... fast, transparent and 0% CPU load... maybe just deleting the last (redundant/yellow) item on the legend might help with that ? ...

Last edited by rafi (2010-02-24 13:04:04)

Firon · 2010-02-24 13:15:05

No, it won't help. It's because of the way it's implemented (faked transparency with standard GDI)

Jimboni · 2010-02-24 13:23:14

On linux (using WINE), utorrent with gui.tranparent_graph_legend enable the cpu raises to 100% when the graph tab is clicked.

Disabling gui.tranparent_graph_legend solves the problem.

Please devs keep an eye on WINE , i know linux is not a target OS, but all versions of utorrent had worked flawlessly. And it works far better and faster than native aplications XD !!

Regards

emc · 2010-02-24 13:53:25

[size=1.5]SETUP GUIDE BUG[/size]

1) I checked port which is not currently forwarded
2) I got red cross icon and right result - port is not open
3) I checked port which is currently forwarded
4) I got green check mark icon and right result - port is open
5) I checked port which is not currently forwarded
6) I got red cross icon but result - port is open

rafi · 2010-02-24 22:28:34

Firon:
No, it won't help. It's because of the way it's implemented (faked transparency with standard GDI)

another idea: so, maybe without the gray background at all ? like 100% transparent, just write the legend text as a part of the the graph's blue background , and draw the lines over them ?

Last edited by rafi (2010-02-24 22:30:00)

muouyiyi · 2010-02-25 14:57:35

so nice a tool!

rafi · 2010-02-25 21:50:29

Some issues for your comments:
Overhead example: http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?id=69416
Packets amount/size/distribution: http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?id=69592

lalbhai · 2010-02-26 02:56:39

i Dont want to upload

iycgtptyarvg · 2010-02-26 07:12:39

@lalbhai
Then bittorrent is not for you. I would suggest trying either Usenet or web-sites like Rapidshare.

alex14san · 2010-02-26 07:54:05

What values of overhead are considered normal? I have 20-30kB on 1mbit connection.
2 active torrents, 512 total connections, 128 per torrent (typically it's ~90 active peers),

So about 15-25% of traffic is getting wasted on overhead? Seems too much for me, what can I do to minimize it?

rafi · 2010-02-26 08:27:38

@alex: see my post/links @#91 above. I think I have the same result as you . I guess it's something they are working on improving right now (at least I hope so...)

Firon · 2010-02-26 10:34:12

alex14san wrote:

What values of overhead are considered normal? I have 20-30kB on 1mbit connection.
2 active torrents, 512 total connections, 128 per torrent (typically it's ~90 active peers),
http://s006.radikal.ru/i213/1002/c8/43310321f66d.png
So about 15-25% of traffic is getting wasted on overhead? Seems too much for me, what can I do to minimize it?

More connections = more overhead. Keep that in mind.

war59312 · 2010-02-26 10:39:12

Very odd, after all these years this suddenly appears when I just now closed uTorrent:

As you can see I'm running Windows Vista. It's 32bit SP2 in fact.

Easy enough to fix by downloading and extracting http://support.microsoft.com/kb/180071 .

Right clicked msvbvm50.inf and choose install. No more error when closing uTorrent.

Very strange this just now popped up.

Perhaps it is because of http://support.microsoft.com/KB/976264 .

But why does Windows Vista think uTorrent needs Visual Basic 5.0 Run-Time Files in the first place. Is this really the case?

Last edited by war59312 (2010-02-26 10:48:35)

rafi · 2010-02-26 10:42:36

@Firon: 2 active torrents @ 128 connections per torrent is more or less what the 'setup guide' recommends for 1M connection. 28K/100K overhead is not what 'we' expect, being much higher than in TCP.

Last edited by rafi (2010-02-26 10:43:05)

crash_1 · 2010-02-26 12:29:43

after the resolution initiating outbound UDP traffic, many ISP seen incredible growth in the number of PPS, as Utorrent reduces the size of UDP packet to very small values. Begins to fall HARD, lost packets other traffic. Maybe should prohibit the creation of very small packets, or otherwise bring to mind the transfer of data via UDP?

Firon · 2010-02-26 12:41:18

2.0.1 will reduce the overall PPS for you compared to 2.0, since it uses a larger initial packet size (600 bytes instead of 300) and ramps it up more quickly/intelligently.
Still, high rates of UDP traffic are something you're gonna have to live with as time goes by, since there's more VoIP and other protocols that use UDP that are growing dramatically.

µTorrent Community Forums

#76 2010-02-23 19:16:08

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

#77 2010-02-23 22:08:53

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

#78 2010-02-24 00:18:42

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

#79 2010-02-24 07:47:37

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

#80 2010-02-24 10:46:42

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

#81 2010-02-24 12:40:29

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

#82 2010-02-24 12:45:48

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

#83 2010-02-24 12:52:42

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

#84 2010-02-24 12:55:44

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

#85 2010-02-24 13:03:05

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

#86 2010-02-24 13:15:05

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

#87 2010-02-24 13:23:14

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

#88 2010-02-24 13:53:25

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

#89 2010-02-24 22:28:34

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

#90 2010-02-25 14:57:35

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

#91 2010-02-25 21:50:29

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

#92 2010-02-26 02:56:39

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

#93 2010-02-26 07:12:39

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

#94 2010-02-26 07:54:05

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

#95 2010-02-26 08:27:38

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

#96 2010-02-26 10:34:12

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

#97 2010-02-26 10:39:12

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

#98 2010-02-26 10:42:36

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

#99 2010-02-26 12:29:43

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

#100 2010-02-26 12:41:18

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

Board footer