rafi Posted January 29, 2009 Report Share Posted January 29, 2009 - Change: add bt.transp_disposition value (3) for uTP-onlywhat is the value for the standard support for both uTP & TCP ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moogly Posted January 29, 2009 Report Share Posted January 29, 2009 1 no ?Is there a reason why the filename of uT 1.8.2 is not utorrent.exe but utorrent-1.8.2.upx.exe ?Mistake in renaming ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted January 29, 2009 Report Share Posted January 29, 2009 I've just installed it and it was 0 as default... !? why do we have to guess... it's simpler to just write it down at the first post here (0/1/2/3=...) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
schnurlos Posted January 29, 2009 Report Share Posted January 29, 2009 uTP: read here in the 1.9 alpha forum http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?id=49813 about it.How to enable and disable it:Preferences > Advanced, set bt.transp_disposition to:255 - both TCP and uTP (default)10 - uTP only5 - TCP onlyIt is 255 in 1.9 by default, 0 in 1.8.2 (read that too http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?pid=378146#p378146 ) so Rafi should know it already Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted January 29, 2009 Report Share Posted January 29, 2009 shnur: it I knew what's the deal here on 1.8.2 - I wouldn't ask.... do YOU know ? so, 0 = 255 ok. 3 = 10 , and the "5" (TCP only) ? ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackboot Posted January 30, 2009 Report Share Posted January 30, 2009 Interesting...I've upgraded to 1.8.2 and set bt.transp_disposition to "3" with encryption enabled and incoming legacy connections allowed.I am on a University network which is 5Mb/s up and down. However, the University network is throttling bittorrent traffic and I get very consistent speeds capped at 90KB/s up and down. With the new client and said config changes I am now maxing out my upload speed (5Mb/s). However, my download speed is only about 1Mb/s. This could simply be due to poor swarm speed though. It appears that using uTP defeats my university traffic shaping.Now, that may sound just great, but what if every other resident here was also able to defeat the University's traffic shaping? Am I correct that the way uTP works is that regular TCP traffic (the majority of activity) will take priority and not be slowed down? If so, this is great news because the "wasted" bandwidth will be used when it can while not impacting regular academic and other real-time use. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 I don't think there is such thing as uTP (which is UDP...) priority on a public network. You can control it only on your own PC. And why don't you just try to use 1.9 instead ? ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lockhaven Posted February 1, 2009 Report Share Posted February 1, 2009 Seems like I get loads more Teredo connects on this client than 1.8.1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gLes Posted February 3, 2009 Report Share Posted February 3, 2009 Hi!Got a crash dump when trying to install latest build over version 1.8.1. It crashed after installation, but it seemed to have copied itself into the uTorrent folder under C:\Program Files. Nevertheless it started running afterwards from the download folder.http://www.mediafire.com/file/jwyznmjug0m/14442-utorrent.988d.dmpBest regards,gLes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firon Posted February 3, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 3, 2009 Yeah, looks like there's a problem with the latest build. I've reverted the exe to 14153. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ugatme Posted February 3, 2009 Report Share Posted February 3, 2009 Big dissappointment with 1.82. First off downloads had trouble passing 200 kB/s, switched back to 1.81 and went straight up to 600 kB/s. Also wouldn't save changes to limit upload speeds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guijarrelson Posted February 3, 2009 Report Share Posted February 3, 2009 Ok, then, in this moment, the 1.8.2 uTorrent download links to 14153? No new build for now until the bug will fix, no? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GFree Posted February 3, 2009 Report Share Posted February 3, 2009 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted February 3, 2009 Report Share Posted February 3, 2009 Can't you read ? Firon just said they reverted back to build 153 due to problems... And to your issue - maybe one of your RSS feeds/filters downloads it ?edit: just got this debian here too...edit2: GFree- the first 'question' was aimed at those commenting about the "old" build #... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
w4r10ck Posted February 3, 2009 Report Share Posted February 3, 2009 Can someone else confirm they've got a new torrent called debian-40r6-i386-CD-1.iso in their lists?Yep. Check this, and the image below. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GFree Posted February 3, 2009 Report Share Posted February 3, 2009 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick222 Posted February 3, 2009 Report Share Posted February 3, 2009 But why file version of "2009-02-02: Version 1.8.2 (build 14442)" show this: "FileVersion 1.8.2.14153" ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
schnurlos Posted February 3, 2009 Report Share Posted February 3, 2009 @Nick222: http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?pid=391944#p391944 (some posts before in that thread) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hsv4lyf Posted February 3, 2009 Report Share Posted February 3, 2009 I have just re-installed windows and downloaded the 153 version of uTorrent and it is still trying to download debian-40r6-i386-CD-1.iso. If you don't want it to keep downloading until there is a fix, just do as what I have as shown in the image below. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tjobo Posted February 3, 2009 Report Share Posted February 3, 2009 I also got debian-40r6-i386-CD-1.iso in my list.schnurlos wrote:Redownload and start the 1.8.2 build 14153 manually from http://www.utorrent.com/download.phpDid not work. Tried twice.It even adds itself on restart even if I try to delete it. Fucking virus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firon Posted February 3, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 3, 2009 It's not a virus... it was my screwup. I uploaded a build with the debian torrent bundled. I've replaced it with the correct executable now, and it's still 14153 that's uploaded right now.The bundling feature still needs a little tweaking, but it will be open for anyone to use once it's finalized. The .torrent bundling needs changing so that it always shows the Add torrent dialog, much like it does now for btsearch URLs.It will not open you to security exploits by malicious URLs being bundled, no more than opening a regular torrent with bad files at least.A full guide will be put up later detailing how it works and how to use it. People will be able to bundle btsearch URLs, RSS feeds, and .torrents files. Only one URL though. The bundled URL will be scrubbed from the exe when you use the installer, so relaunching later wouldn't reload a removed torrent. It doesn't do it when running in-place, though.That being said, does anyone have any concerns about the bundling? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted February 3, 2009 Report Share Posted February 3, 2009 will it be available concurrently for 1.9 ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firon Posted February 3, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 3, 2009 1.9 will have it as well, though the last alpha for it doesn't have the feature yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tjobo Posted February 3, 2009 Report Share Posted February 3, 2009 Why not upload build 14442, as it is the latest version? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firon Posted February 3, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 3, 2009 It was rolled back due to a large number of crash dumps piling in. We're investigating it now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.