µTorrent Community Forums

Lord Leks Darkmind

Member

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

advanced->bt.transp_disposition - 5 - even worse. +40 more in  30 minutes... reverted to advanced->bt.transp_disposition - 15 - and num of conn dropped by 15... i`m clueless... maybe it`s mypersonal bug...

SacredCultivator

Member

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

Link for Download doesn't work, 404 Not Found.

---

Currently recruiting Translators/Karaoke TS'ers:
Hello!Fansubs
PM if interested.

Firon

Administrator

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

Yeah, I just pulled the build, the fix isn't properly fixed...

HumanRage

Member

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

hi guys !

just registered to report abnormal program behaviour : i just used the "reset bans" on a torrent (coz a very fast seed is making my line failing but it's worth it) and a bonus line caught my eye : i unbanned another user, and it was me ! no hash error up from me in the log, i'm only catching blocked connections and misc errors.

it was my LAN ip address, seems like utorrent founds itself as a fellow peer, and auto-ban this peer. i've only got basics in programming but i know there is something twisted in the logic here

i can't specify a given ip to utorrent because i'm on DSL with dynamic IP, changes every once in a whle, and utorrent works perfectly well beside that (well, i must admit i set the trans_disp at 5 though, too much overhead for now)

behaviour observed on a 18408, i saw 2 versions since but this is not listed so...[ EDIT before post  : still the same with last version ] i report. my belief is that utorrent doesn't have, in any way, a reason ever to even attempt to consider itself as a fellow peer. if this is more time-saving that checking every time, well at least don't unban when using the general purpose UI command ? anyway, this should be fixed in the local peers detection (i think so ? i don't deactivate it because he found for example 1 seed and 14 peers on an active torrent )

my two cents, and keep up the good work, utp might work some day but for now, it shouldn't be that aggressive (i mean, taking precedence as soon as you switch from 5 to 15 for example) and shouldn't cripple retail home DSL equipments

edit : what ? recalled the build ? but i got it like 25 minutes ago, while starting this post...

edit2 final : and by the way, the anti-robot checkin on registering is not workingg on IE8, somehow i couldn't click where i was supposed, failed 2 times so switched on FF and it works. i swear i'm not a script though !

Last edited by HumanRage (2010-03-25 17:24:44)

Lord Leks Darkmind

Member

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

hmm... i think it`s another problem...
so: incomplete files is .!ut marked. but(!) after files is finished .!ut is still there! (on some files, not all) i tried to stop downloading. recheked.re-started utorrent. restarted PC. no effect. manually removed .!ut from a file names. utorrent didn`t react at all! like it was from the beginnig! only 2 last versions is seems to have this glitch...

123459

Member

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

Got a permacrash if any incomplete torrents present. Rollbacking...
xp sp2 32bit, 18758
crashdump

Last edited by 123459 (2010-03-26 02:21:52)

Firon

Administrator

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

Do any of those torrents have webseeds? I think we have it fixed, but it'd be nice to confirm that first.

Firon

Administrator

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

New build up with the crash fixed. Sorry about that!

osmosis

Member

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

Any chance of seeing the magnet uri/maindoc.ico association bug fixed before 2.0.1 final?

(As previously reported here and here, and independently reported/reproduced here. Jus' sayin' )

Last edited by osmosis (2010-03-26 12:31:02)

123459

Member

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

Firon, sorry for the silence. Not all, but yes - incomplete torrents have webseeds.
Now all works fine, thank you.

muddymind

Member

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

sorry... wrong thread :S

Last edited by muddymind (2010-03-26 15:26:05)

SkyHi

Member

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

Huge overhead (both up and down, about 50kb/s) while downloading 1 torrent at 1Mbps and seeding 2 with the upload limit at 90 kbps.
Win 7 Ultimate 64 bit.

Switeck

Member

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

If you're downloading at 1024 KiloBYTES/second, then 50 KiloBYTES/second of overheads on down and up sides because of it is only about 5% overheads. That's actually a huge improvement over the 20-25% overheads reported previously, so I presume you're getting the vast majority of your download speed from TCP seeds/peers.

uTorrent v2.0.1 generating 20-30% overheads when using uTP...but less than 10% overheads when using TCP alone:
http://img62.imageshack.us/img62/9993/ulutptcp3ping.png

See this also for more details: http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?id=72106

Last edited by Switeck (2010-03-29 23:33:27)

SEtx

Member

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

Bug in re-hashing: open new torrent with multiple files and select only some to download, relocate files that were selected as 'skip' to already existing ones, torrent re-hashes but fail to recognize added parts until they are selected to be downloaded.

Re-hashing of absent-and-skipped files seems quite inefficient.

rafi

Member

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

Bug: In RSS feeds categories/section - "Disable" is missing from the right click context menu on "all feeds" and also when you select multiple RSS feeds (that one of them is NOT enabled).
Thus: It's not possible to disabled multiple feeds conveniently

---

My uTorrent >Upgrade, Speed-up & other 'Best Practice' Tips<
My v3.x quick-fix >"Best Practice" settings.dat file< (^ see tip #O)
Best >v3.3.1 beta-RC<
My *new* >>>>>>>>  v3.2.x/3.3.0 Web-Help Site/File  <<<<<<<<<

hharis

Member

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

just one question, i haven`t fount with search option...
i haven`t seen in earlier builds, but in latest, default settings of net.max_halfopen is 400.
is this correct or something is wrong?

Firon

Administrator

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

This is correct on Vista SP2 and Windows 7. Neither of these OSes have a built-in half-open limit anymore. Anything else still gets a halfopen of 8.

Greg Hazel

BitTorrent Developer

Re: µTorrent 2.0.1 beta 18786

http://lh6.ggpht.com/_6IoA7yojDSI/S6s_y … 22_bug.png

As you can see, I'm still having this bug with BEP22... It does not request PTR record and uses my NETBIOS name (Eliotbook) in SRV request instead...

Client was started with only one trackerless Torrent active...

What do you get when you run "nslookup" on your public IP? Are there any other peers on the local network or the same machine? Getting the NETBIOS name implies either uTorrent is not aware of the public IP (and is aware of a LAN IP), or reverse DNS for your public IP is somehow mis-configured (possibly on a local DNS server).