-
Content Count
10,433 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
dreamsteps started following jewelisheaven
-
Yeah, there wasn't too long ago a request for conditional replace, similar to find-by-key/value except as another key/value as the primary condition. If you want to do things that way I'd recommend starting small, by label then. So you filter one label at a time, or just do each individually right now if the scripts previously in the thread don't help.
-
Did you read the first post? If you only want to change specific paths, you can use Find/Replace-by-value if not, you can use Find/Replace All
-
So the spurts of Vista crashes was a regression? Is it Vista-based or Vista-specific. . . All the people running Win7, do we tell them to update?
-
1st, that's part of the cookie isn't it? 2nd, Ultima mentioned it in toppost. You did read the top post didn't you? ;P
-
Thank you for keeping up the good work guys
-
I wouldn't call sparse files BROKEN, however when files have > 65534 chunks of sparse data, the OS was breaking. This is of course very unlikely in small files, but when you get into the multi-gigabyte files it becomes more of an issue. So, to note, files are only made sparse on creation. So, turn it ON make new files.
-
What pre-allocate? diskio.sparse_files is default OFF these days. It was to avoid Vista issues. However given the new ntfs.sys has the fix By Windows 7, it should be enabled TRUE by default.
-
The not re-checking is apparently a regression between this latest and the previous 15358.
-
Conservative Settings Chart (Alternate Speed Guide for uTorrent)
jewelisheaven replied to Switeck's topic in Speed Problems
Forgive me, but I just noticed this because someone bumped it, but according to http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?id=52014 THIS is "our" guide *now*. Maybe IT will be adopted by 1.9 stable. Edit: Fail-fu is at 1000 today, for manual URLs. -
You still haven't mentioned HOW YOU ARE GAUGING these numbers.
-
Guess MY result is the anomaly :/
-
I set 1.9 or 1.8.3 for that matter to 10, which is UTP only yes. I set 1.8.2 to 0 (no UTP), Banned. I set 1.8.2 to 2 or 3, connection successful. This is not a problem when set to 5 or any other combination allowing TCP.
-
Explain why I couldn't connect then. Banned is pretty much self explanatory ??
-
... IF @ 0 uT is still accepting UTP connections, that is a bug http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?pid=393902#p393902 (I could not reproduce) Testing multiple connection attempts on LAN peers, I didn't see this multiple connection behavior :/ sorry. Edit: seems they did backport disabling TCP and make bt.transp_disposition=0 work correctly, as http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?pid=399544#p399544 says that 1.8.2 still accepts incoming. Fortunately, I don't see that. :/
-
Not sure whether you're talking about packets or connection attempts as you use both in your report. As far as configuring UTP, that's what bt.transp_disposition is for.