First off, I'm just the messenger here. Don't bite MY head of. They said that about asbestos, cigarettes and Thalidomide as well. They were wrong. Thanks. and I am only pointing out what several virus scanners have found. Nothing more, nothing less. You've chosen your reaction, and that's that, I guess. Okay, this is an odd defense. Not to be facetious, but no, I haven't seen those two, because of the other EIGHT virus reports! This could very well be plausible, but it's not like they would say: "hey, you know what: our scripts are very vulnerable to piggybacking viruses" now would they? Still, it's likely you have a point. This "We're persecuted because we pirate against Big Corp" defense is NOT very plausible, and is a bit self-serving. Okay, so let's say that version 7 and 5 have suffered from false positives, do you REALLY think that the same goes for version 4 and 6? I don't think I've ever seen any sort of software program with that many viruses! Listen, I get it, you work hard, probably for no pay at all, and it's your baby and all that. You might do all this voluntarily. But aren't you worried about 9 to 12 virus scanners reporting malware? I know, you just wanna shrug it off, and say F .... you or whatever, and that is of course, YOUR prerogative. But if I were you, I would worry what went so terribly wrong from version 3 to 4 that it produced TWELVE error reports? And from version 5 to 6, from 1/2 to 9(NINE)/10(TEN) error reports? Okay, let's put it this way: Aren't you REALLY curious what made the number of error reports DROP from NINE to just ONE, when you went from version 6 to 7? I would be. 1- If you're still reading (which I kind of doubt, but maybe others can point this out), don't you realize that the MOST interesting thing is not that your program has 9 - 12 virus reports. The MOST interesting is that sometimes it has NOT. The up and down swings are immense. 2- Also, why there's a difference in unicode versus ansi versions? 3- Also, if unicode is supposed to handle Chinese characters and stuff, then why is the only virusscanner with a Chinese sounding name Jiangmin always negative about (edit: the unicode versions of ) BEncoder, but not when it's Ansi?? 4- Also, why does version 4-unicode have 12 reports, but 4-ansi only 1 or 2? Based on all these reports, I'd go with version 5.10-ansi, because McAfee has a better reputation than Jiangmin, but maybe I am too eurocentric ... IDK But ... I can imagine it's easier to shrug this all of and live your life.