Jump to content

Ryrynz

Established Members
  • Posts

    560
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    25

Posts posted by Ryrynz

  1. This behaviour still in last build. In older version 3.0.26473 (32-bit) - all OK. Please, fix this. Very annoying if you have many torrents, and selection jumps eberywhere after removing.

    Been experiencing this for quite some time, dunno how it hasn't been spotted and fixed yet. Should really start adding numbers at the end of 3.1.2 Firon :P

  2. You probably corrupted your RSS.DAT settings file, maybe during the upgrade. I think that some kind of auto-backup to all settings file should be done when upgrading to *any* version!

    I'd like to see an official statement regarding the continued saga of corrupted DAT files. You have quite a major issue here, average users shouldn't have to manually back up their program data before upgrading and most of them wouldn't even know where to look.

    Perhaps can option ca be added so people can opt in to send their DAT files (sans the Ipfilter) before upgrade so that you can track down where the issue lies? That along with providing a full auto back up if things go south.

  3. When setting an upload or download limit for an torrent which is seeding or is stopped there is no instant refresh of the appropriate column, changing it on an active downloading torrent it updates fine.

    Feature Request - Combined Upload Speed/Limit and Download Speed/Limit columns.

    For example if I set my upload limit to 50kB/s and it was maxing out it would display as

    50 kB/s / 50kB/s, this would save some horizontal space as well as make things tidier.

    Also would like to see a uTorrent button which would function just like the Firefox button does and end up removing the primarily waste of space menu bar.

    Went back to 3.0 for a test, then grabbed latest 3.1.2 (currenlty 26729) and it says are are no updates available.

  4. 4 RC builds... 26710 was RC4 ...

    Ha, doesn't say so on the front page but considering it was a small bug fix build I'll let you have it. Plus..saying there were 4 RCs makes it sound worse.. or better I guess, depending on your humor.

    On a side note, can we please have uTorrent remember different sorting views for each label?

    Just small things like that and the ability to search within .torrent files would be hella beneficial.

  5. My thoughts exactly. This should still be in beta and 3.01 should be relisted as the stable. This isn't going to happen of course they'll work on fixing 3.1.x. I don't recommend this version to anyone. Stick with 3.01 or 2.x

    I'd really love to see a search that you could use within a torrent. Finding particular files in a torrent by looking through the list can be quite time consuming, especially with large torrents.

  6. I have two files which have no label, downgrading to 3.0 shows them, updating to 3.1.2 makes them disappear even though the label states two files are there. Also I had a torrent in my list which was not showing, I downloaded the .torrent file again and added it over and over but it never reappeared in my list. Downgraded to 3.0 and added the torrent and it popped into the list just fine. Guess I'm back to 3.01, crazy stuff.

  7. Instead it looks like they'd rather incorporate any future fixes from 3.1 into 3.2 which I don't agree with.

    Sticking with a stable release (with continuing bug fixes) alongside a beta and or alpha builds ends up being a lot less issues for us end users.

    I don’t agree. A stable version should not be touched unless there are critical bugs' date=' that effect many users using it's main functions. Any change/addition in features, and especially - core code (as planned for 3.2) should be on a separate alpha-beta-RC route so to be properly tested an avoid fuck-ups ... There are endless examples here for that... :P [/quote']

    Yes, this was exactly what I was meaning, critical fixes for stable builds only.

    I think I speak for all of us when I say we really don't wish to see a repeat of 3.1 happen again in future, thanks.
    It is not over yet ... ;)

    Ha! I think the way development in uTorrent is done could use a little review, there is no rush for uTorrent releases it's still one of if not the best clients out there. Feel free to have Beta testing last longer, people who want the bleeding edge will come to the forums to download it. I'd just really like to see a STABLE stable.

  8. Agreed Rafi. It's a bit of a mess really, like I said it should have been renamed to 3.2 Alpha as soon as it was deemed unstable, that way they could continue on with a solid "stable" release 3.1.x

    Instead it looks like they'd rather incorporate any future fixes from 3.1 into 3.2 which I don't agree with.

    Sticking with a stable release (with continuing bug fixes) alongside a beta and or alpha builds ends up being a lot less issues for us end users.

    I think I speak for all of us when I say we really don't wish to see a repeat of 3.1 happen again in future, thanks.

  9. Yeah I remember reading Rafi's comments on 3.x and honestly I have to agree, some things just need to stay in beta longer, what's the rush?

    Does anyone else think it would be super to be able to shift or ctrl click on one of the files in a torrent and perform torrent functions like re-check, force start etc? It would be so convenient to not go looking through your torrent list as they can get rather large.

  10. I guess you are right, and making a backup "set" (zip?) of both the exe and the configuration files could have been useful. I don't see how they can easily back up in future 3.1 versions - the 'cache/resume" directory though :(

    The best (safest) practice for now, would be to do your own backup *before* you upgrade...

    Yeah, that's really not a problem, It's just most users wouldn't expect to have to do that. If any developers are reading please, if possible try to implement something.

    On an unrelated note, I would really like to see a mass relocate feature, I'm having to relocate every file individually because some torrents I have look for a subdirectory by the name of the torrent and append it to whatever directory I set as the relocated directory.

    It would be nice to have a tick box perhaps for this to remove any auto generated directories when relocating. I've found a way around by renaming the torrent and selecting the root as the download location but then the torrent name is changed and this might not be ideal.

  11. Yeah, I know, but when it happened that file was gone too. I have all my torrents saved so I just added them all again and did rechecks. Having uTorrent manage more than one backup and perhaps providing us with the interface to restore previous backups from within the program would be a boon. I really don't feel the .old method goes far enough.

  12. Couple of small things.

    When a torrent has finished but nothing has been downloaded the .torrent moves into the specified finished directory, I was thinking it would be more suitable to have it check to see if a file has been downloaded first before shifting the .torrent there.

    Also I've noticed that sometimes the torrent details for the selected torrent sometimes shows another torrents details under the currently selected tab. Clicking on the torrent again refreshes the view.

×
×
  • Create New...