I know this happens every time but.. the changes that are being made in these updates are not the type of changes we should be seeing in release candidate builds.... This stuff should be fixed up in the beta stage aye. so' date=' 3 months ago...[/quote'] Oh Rafi.. I LOL'D. I'm fairly certain he's just talking generally. Like sure, it's stable enough to run without major issues.. but that doesn't really count as stable IMO and he's probably using something similar to my guidlines (forum posts, general experience). 3.2.3 is running 24/7 without any deal breaking issues, no memory leaks, crashes etc, 3.3.x just seems to be a mess that thankfully I'll avoid altogether. It just too many large changes that resulted in general whackiness and a major half year fixathon. It seems any "large" code changes seem to require near a full year of testing, the development process looks just that bad. Maybe just stick to .0.1 version increments every few months?