Jump to content

Ryrynz

Established Members
  • Posts

    560
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    25

Everything posted by Ryrynz

  1. Solid version, sticking with it for awhile yet.
  2. The sole developer is probably more interested in developing pretty purple swirly graphics for Bittorrent. I'd really like to see the tracker get it's own column in the WebUI, that would be hellishly useful, but I guess new offers in the installer are easier to implement and then there's all those bugs. Gotta generate more revenue and "keep the lights on" I do feel though the lights went out some time ago, all except the one in the finance room. Might be an idea to lay this to rest and just move on? It's painfully obvious our expectations aren't being met, unless of course your expectations are more bugs, delays and a lack of development.
  3. People and especially companies generally have an inability to listen to anything that falls outside of what they either want to do or what they believe in. Have you ever known something is the best way or the truth and tried to persuade someone else of it? Personally I just don't bother. If they want to slowly kill themselves let them do it, find another torrent project to follow and help improve, this one is going nowhere fast. Just stop caring, you'll feel better.
  4. There's a very straight forward three word answer to your question, but you won't find it on these forums, unless you get the general gist of the forum posts and draw your own conclusion.
  5. Yes you do otherwise just roll back, saying it needs to be fixed is not going to magically fix it for you. Let Rafi or whoever pays attention to this thread note down the issue and maybe we might see a fix next year, just let it go.
  6. You expect "too much", be happy they even update this thing at all.
  7. Always... It's included in 3.4 (with a few bugs' date=' of cause...)[/quote'] Yeah I remember, hey it's probably the only thing that's been added. With them not even being able to sort out 3.3 ain't no way I'm touching 3.4, I'd rather not waste my own time dealing with the potential issues. Any ideas how many people actually work for Bittorrent Inc? I'm thinking half the staff usernames are the actually the same dude.
  8. LOL always pushin' ya settings. Things are working just fine here.. I do hate that webUI scrolling problem though which I expect will take forever to get fixed.. And not being able to search out files in a torrent is still a pain in the butt, along with the inability to have files auto move when the label changes.. amongst other things.. We'll see how many years I have to wait for all that.
  9. Here's the thing, they obviously don't care. They're just riding this for all it's worth with the least amount of effort required to maintain it. One fix here, one fix there.. what every week? I really wish that guy that found the source code had actually leaked it, I'm sure things would be a lot better if someone with actual skill and determination actually got a hold of it. As it stands even considering the drip feeding and the poor coding quality it's still one of the better clients out there, which honestly is quite sad. I will continue to use it until something better comes up, but I'm far from impressed with the rate of development.
  10. +1' date=' since stability is far far away in the 3.4 branch...[/quote'] 3.4 is probably a good few months off at the very least.. I wonder though if they would think 'cos they already have one in beta they shouldn't have another in beta.. What I think is that any significant changes in uTorrent brings such a sh!t tonne of new bugs they couldn't hope to fix everything problematic in both 3.3 and 3.4 in any sort of reasonable time frame. Fingers crossed someone there is someone smart enough to green light 3.3.3 and just MAYBE we might get this stable build I've been wanting to see for the past year. Is Bittorrent Inc up for the challenge of releasing an actual stable build?
  11. 3.2.3 is solid for the most part. Regress verb 1. Return to a former or less developed state. The "less developed" regressed version here is fairly obvious, I'd say you're upgrading to a previous version An actual stable build would be nice. Still hoping for 3.3.3.
  12. Hey yetisyny I think you completely misunderstood what myself and Rafi wrote, what I'm saying isn't related to offers at all and Rafi knows all about what to avoid/change/not change much better than your mum. So whilst your post does make valid points to the people who have no clue, it's doesn't relate to what either myself or Rafi posted, thanks anyway.
  13. You mean 3.4. Also did you have to quote an entire changelog post? Learn how to forum.
  14. Exactly why I'm avoiding 3.3.x like the plague.
  15. I like how the developers or anyone associated with the code has zero contribution to the forum.
  16. Or someone just can't program very well.
  17. *cough* 8 months ago *cough* I might have found the reason/bug and the way to bypass the issue till they'll fix it. Try this: - Use shift-F2->Advanced - locate ul_rate_download_thres - change he default 0 to something like 5+ (KB/s) And you are done... Let me know if it helped. There seems to be some residual download rate of 2-3K going on for some reason, that prohibits this alternate limit to take effect. The thing is - they should have just used the seeding/active numbers in the categories ... much simpler... So yeah, I think he knows.. It would seem the dev doesn't though. I suspect I'll be running 3.2.3 for awhile yet, looking forward to 3.3.3 next year.
  18. Ya know, this comes as absolutely no surprise to me personally having frequented these forums over the years but really? Release candidate builds with crashes on install/shutdown/auto updating/loading settings? Those are alpha stage coding issues.. The fix list in 3.3.x truly is amazing to behold, congrats on setting the standard. Ya know, It's almost like the code is fighting back
  19. hmm... my teamviewer|logmein "webui" seems to function flowlessly... ;p I prefer the WEBUI most of the time, it's quicker than using Teamviewer which I also use occassionally when the WEBUI doesn't cut it (setting torrent locations) which I admit would be bloody nice to have in the WEBUI also. But anyway that doesn't detract from the fact the WEBUI isn't doing something it should. Not updating all the torrents regardless of whether there's a "better" option is still something that should be corrected. One more thing, when we will get the ability to move files automatically based on their label (after download)? Constantly moving things around, you don't always set labels before they finish downloading.
  20. Guess I'll hold off trying out qbitTorrent for awhile then.. BTW devs a tracker column in the webUI would be quite helpful. Also have you guys sorted out why in the WEBUI the seeds and peers aren't updated for every torrent? Most just say 0/0 with only a few updating, there's no problems in the actual client.
  21. Any you think other clients do not have issues?... uTorrent + my settings is the best there is' date=' changelog or no changelog ... [/quote'] Is there any software that doesn't have a single issue bar Nasa's space flight software? probably not. The point I'm getting at is best client or not, something's bound to overtake it. There's only so long you can stand still in a race before you lose your position.
  22. Speak for yourself... You failed to grasp what I was getting at here. The reason why nobody expects a change log is because most of the time there never is one. The amount of times people have asked "where is teh changelog?" is by no means a small number' date=' hell you'll find me asking the same thing. Nice to see people coming to the same conclusion. I expect we'll see other clients start to pick up in popularity.
  23. I don't think any of us here expects a changelog and even if it was available it would have one.. maybe two bug fixes if you're lucky. A solid weeks work.
  24. Which is unsupported at these forums AND this thread is about version 3.4 But 3.4 is the development version, they're not going to patch 3.2.3 or 3.3 for this issue are they? The WebUI version hasn't changed versions at all you understand, so this could be version 5.0 and it's going to have the issue. But really just to make this post more relevant and to also prove a point to you I grabbed 3.4... and guess what? It did the exact same thing. No surprises there, guess I can get support for this now aye?
×
×
  • Create New...