Ryrynz

First post needs to be updated, 3.3 beta is referred to as an alpha.

Surely the limiter ain't a seriously hard thing to fix as for the not-fully tested IO system It's been 7 months, surely it would have received some sort of testing beforehand.. Although we are talking BitTorrent inc here.. =/

is 3.4 only ever going to be a test build? Seems a little pointless in releasing 3.4 unless other features make their way in many of the fixes would appear to be 3.3 related. You should update 3.3 to include auto updating (there doesn't seem to be any major issues with it from what I see) While on the topic of 3.3, it could probably hit a beta phase about now.

What did you expect? Everybody on the net said that would happen. Now I wouldn't say it's terribly bad but there are things that need to be addressed., I wish we'd see some of these issues improved in 3.3.

*Facepalm*

Really interested in knowing what's going on here.

It doesn't have to be this bad though. Well here's something to think about, why are there so many betas for these simple bug fix builds? It's almost like they're unsure they can even fix their own bugs, doesn't that make you think about the coding quality? I really think so many betas is overdoing it, it's just one giant beta test version, without a doubt it shows a lack of testing. Now I don't mind if people want to constantly test these patches and report simple issues found within minutes of testing (I mean.. it's your time)..but at what point do you say I'm tired of finding basic issues in "beta" software. I don't know of any other software that has such a poor development process. Can you name one that does things in a similar fashion? I follow quite a few and I can't name one, look at all the fixes over the last few versions. For such a reasonably sized company (you all know the dollar value here) the builds contain very few fixes and generally break something in the process. I also question how many coders are working on this, I see larger and more frequent commits by one man teams that have day jobs, color me unimpressed.

We're talking about bug fix changes in a beta bug fix build (3.2.2) of a bug fix build (3.2) built upon 3 previous bug fix builds (3.1.1, 3.1.2, 3.1.3) not an entire client, you don't have to code an entire client to see the following: a) There's little to no testing done before a release They tend to break more than they fix. Tell me I'm wrong Zarggg, these beta releases should be better than this, especially considering the above. It's not like ground breaking new features are being added or anything (see release notes in 3.1.x & 3.2) that would cause so many bugs now THAT I could understand. It's just poor quality coding and I'm not the first to say so and I wish it was better. You reckon there's going to be a 3.2.3?

LOL, seriously.. what are you guys doing over there? Should hire some better programmers...

transferring a file through WebUI via get file(s) which doesn't exist (already deleted) results in a 0 byte file being downloaded, can we just have it pop the message 'Error: file doesn't exist'?

28086 wasn't respecting my 'Put downloads in' Directory setting which was C:\Users\Admin\Downloads\Torrents\Downloading it stuck them in C:\Users\Admin\Downloads\Torrents Downgrading to 3.2 fixed it.

Yup. They've goofed it. Perhaps a drop down box? Delete partially downloaded content on torrent completion - Automatically -Prompt - Never You don't have pre-allocation on do you?

3.2.1 is done. Released. No news about it on the front page (Why is the website so bare? get some news on there!) no topic update or statement.. just secretly posted to the download page..

3.2.2. Topic title is wrong. Thankful for a another bug fix type build.

Well when you see news of a stable before a forum post.. or even an update, it still says 28086 is RC2 on the first page.. Anyway cheers for the reply even if you were a bit of a douche about it. Also your reply doesn't in any way address what I was commenting on in the first place, which makes me wonder why you replied at all.. Guess Osmosis was fairly accurate.

3.2.1 stable leaked to web? =/ Okay.. Thought there were still issues to resolve things to improve.. 3.2.2 anyone?

I get that as well. Haven't these messages been around for awhile now? I'm sure someone posted about this issue. I've been getting file not found messages in my client ever since 3.2 landed I think, I've just ignored em, must not be much of a priority to fix it.

That's a lot nicer Virtual_ManPL! Having the OK button to the right side is a bit naff. I'd also really like to see the bandwidth options on this page too, rather than having to click advanced for this. Surely there's enough room?

Any chance we could have the ability to move the sidebar in a little more?

I've never seen so many uTorrent devs out in the forum before.. wow.

That's correct Ciaobaby, as I said in my previous post.

No, they're just links to their respective pages on those sites, that's fair.. I clicked each of them and they disappeared surprisingly and my browser loaded the respective homepages. I restarted the client and guess what? they're still gone! BIG. FREAKING. DEAL.

I already do that.. I would still like this option, even if it was just limited to LAN access.

Going to put this out there again because it would be so easy to add and so useful, please add 'Open Containing Folder' in the WebUI. Thanks.

Found this on a private tracker site which is setting out to ban a few clients soon. "There is also an issue with uTorrent 3.x, we're not sure which client(s) in this series will be specifically affected, but the problem is that the client is not banning those IPs sending bad data. This is not good for the user or the site. Once these clients are identified, additional 'official' announcements will be made and those client(s) will also be banned." They're recommending version 2.2 as a solution.. Can someone comment on this issue?