Jump to content

Ryrynz

Established Members
  • Posts

    560
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    25

Everything posted by Ryrynz

  1. The WebUI doesn't show multiple labels. A torrent that has two plus labels will only show as being the last applied label. Setting the first label again in the WebUI shows that the file is in the second label list (showing (1)) but when clicked upon to view the files in the label the main window shows no files inside. If I log into uTorrent remote the second label isn't even there, but is on the actual machine in the client. In summary, uTorrent remote has no support for multiple labels and the WebUI has only partial support.
  2. Would anyone else be interested in the feature of setting upload and download rates for specific labels?
  3. The time frame generally for things like this is "When it's done" There was a rushed development IMO in the 3.x branch that 3.2 and 3.3 are trying to fix up and judging from the previous post it's still got a way to go.. I'd say give it a couple of months before beta although even then there's no certainty it's not going to break something. As always back up before you try it.
  4. Could you guys perhaps assign someone (preferably is the person who uploads the builds) to be the one to upload the change log? The amount of times the change log hasn't been there with people having to request it has gotten beyond what's reasonable IMO.
  5. Any chance of getting Up Limit, Down Limit and Tracker columns in the Web UI?
  6. I would find it would be useful as I don't always set the label before it completes the torrent, no biggie. No rafi = no go. Cheers.
  7. Is the settings.dat from 3.1 incompatible with 3.2? just wondering if the changelog note for that still applies, thus all upgrades to 3.2 will need to have configuration redone.
  8. Would anyone else like to see the ability to move files to the appropriate labelled directory once labelled after they've finished downloading? The current option only moves the files if they've been labelled before finishing.
  9. It's only you that's having this problem. If you're not prepared to figure out what's going wrong & where then change to another client or drop back to which ever version prevents the problem from occurring, it's really not that difficult.
  10. Also might be an idea to submit it to the devs so they can hopefully figure out what causes it to happen..
  11. I just had one of my torrents finish and it moved the file as I have set up in the options but when I 'Open Containing Folder' on that file it opens up my user directory instead, so the obviously the link to the file is borked. I restarted the client and it's the same deal. If I click on any other non downloaded file from the torrent it opens up the directory fine, it's just on the file that's 100% completed that's not linking. Are there any fixes implemented for this in either 3.2 or 3.3?
  12. That's not so... Ok. Revert back to 2.0.4 2.0.4 doesn't even have the feature. And seriously' date=' not more than 100 people use this feature.[/quote'] Still, you could be nicer about it, way to go alienating your user base man. You could have just said, we know of the issue it's not top priority but we'll fix it when we can, that way you don't come off sounding like a ....
  13. Might want to update the topic with the latest build number.
  14. I just downloaded 3.1.3 again and it's build 26837..
  15. Started up my uTorrent today to find it not fully loading and sitting in memory consuming 500+ MB. Looked at my settings.dat and find it's at 122MB, deleted and replaced with a backup, all okay. Let me know if you'd like a archived copy. Build 26994
  16. DreadWingKnight, I think people are just generally fed up 3.x that they'll try the latest beta which in all fairness does say it's meant to address issues with 3.1.x so you'd think that with that being the main focus that there would be little or no issues with 3.2. It's when you see a bug fix build introducing more errors that it's fixing you have to start ask questions. We know 3.2 is supposed to address many 3.x issues, but I think it would be an idea to rely less on users to fault find what seem to be easy to reproduce issues which seem to be found within hours of release. This begs the question, are these builds being tested at all by the development team? Because if they are, they really should be tested more before releasing.
  17. Any chance of a simple Ban peer option on right click?
  18. Shameless feature request: Could we get Utorrent remembering the last view per label rather than just the one remembered view for every label? Thanks.
  19. Yes, that's the general consensus around the internet, I'm hoping that there's significant effort put into 3.2 to fix everything that's broken and to achieve that 2.2.1 stability.
  20. I'm liking the prioritize by file order option.
  21. As far as the downloading of individual files go, I vote to remove the 'Don't download' option from the context menu and instead replace it with check boxes down the left hand side of the 'Files' tab. This makes it consistent with the 'add new torrent' window and makes it easier to select the files you don't want to download. Less clicks, consistent interface, win win IMO.
  22. I've mentioned this a couple of times, I end up labeling everything and having to click to sort quite often.
  23. Learn to pay attention to build numbers. Or it could be said that Utorrent 3.1.x had quite a few bugs to be squashed. Multiple updates are preferable to delaying updates to merge into a new build but while it's preferable, it doesn't exactly look good for the software if it's classed as stable. It's too late now though, it's done. Hopefully there are less issues in the future, I really don't know how they broke so many things
×
×
  • Create New...