Jump to content

thelittlefire

Established Members
  • Posts

    4,020
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by thelittlefire

  1. Wireless dongle? That sadly isn't enough with default settings. Wireless drivers are generally good 1) when you have a dedicated card 2)when multiple adapter software doesn't fight for "management" BUT they don't work so well when talking about wireless adapters (USB/Firewire/etc) or x64 unless you pay for high quality. Lower concurrent connections below 100. .. Make your own thread or at least put in USEFUL information if/when you respond again please.

  2. Vista, non-superuser. Not a problem ;) It just means you can't make the firewall rule so uT can't do it manually. If you NEED a rule and are using Windows Firewall, do so. Next time, searching on the error i.e. "Windows Firewall" 0x________ would be better. If it's the first time seeing it's understandable to want to post in this thread, but it would better suited for the Troubleshooting forum :D

  3. That could be added I think, unfortunately I feel it should be disabled by default. With the webui pumping data out already at 100s of bytes per loaded torrent... I think much more data would negate the usefulness of a ... web front-end. If you want ALL of the trimmings of the GUI, don't use the webui.

  4. Some sorts to not have "tiers" of sorting. Prime instance being Added On... It is highly unlikely/impossible to get two torrents with identical added on times. Therefore there is no subset of torrents to sort by.

    Personally I like Status > Share Ratio

  5. Here I'm assuming there's site documentation... are you sure uT 1.8.1 is allowed? It's possible something relating to

    Note to tracker staff: update your build checks! 1.8 is different from 1.7.7. The reserved bit is no longer set.

    ...unless 1.8 isn't allowed either. If there is site resource, are you sure it's not already being addressed?

  6. Ahh thank you, but you presume incorrect. Actually, I was referring to get jewelisheaven the news ;) That's quite a respectable speed hit if indeed you did re-factor code to get Undo working. :D

    I'm going in circles so I'll ask, I tried sifting through several pages of hits for the launch error I'm getting in WINE 1.1.5 of OS X (after using the guide made for uTorrent). Have you installed it before? It's not loading with "err:module:attach_process_dlls "gdi32.dll" failed to initialize, aborting" I've cleaned ~/.wine twice with both the .mpkg and .dmg . If I can't get this running with WINE, it certainly saves having to boot up VMWare Fusion.

    My main attempt is wanting to continue with some standard test files for benchmarking, similar to how uTorrent "works on as weak a system as Windows 95 on a 486 with 14MiB of RAM" I'd like to organize data to show that performance isn't as necessary. Surely http://media.xiph.org/ED/ or the 4200 torrent resume.dat are valid cases but for most people I think seeing an average 32000 piece torrent with 100 files load within X % whether you're running that old 486 or multi-core CPU is a positive commentary of your work.

  7. I know you probably don't want to hear this, but "speed most definitely wasn't a priority"... any numbers to back that up on your end. In any case I know at least one person who'll want to poke at it and give you data.

    moogly, WIP = work in progress. As far as Ctrl-A in Post #131 it's mentioned no accelerators work in child dialogs.

×
×
  • Create New...