Jump to content

StoicJester

Established Members
  • Posts

    224
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by StoicJester

  1. In 1.6.1 you could select files by dragging the mouse about. That doesn't work in this beta. Also, my right click menu doesn't work in the add torrent dialog when I try and right click in the file area. Also, you can no longer ctrl+click and select several different files and then just right click and select. It's very tedious to download large multifile torrents now.

    Edit: If you scroll horizontally in the file area of the add torrent dialog, the display gets messed up. The numbers for size don't stay in their column, but just slide about. The dialog's pretty messed up. =/

  2. interesting. i do the same thing, but i don't find nearly as much unknown peers as you do. must be location.

    i made my dummy flag 16x16, though, because i didn't see any reason not to.

    lixxus.net|UK

    matieux.net|FR

    nc-spectrum.net|NO

    webtapestry.net|UK

  3. a1.net|AT

    alamedanet.net|CA

    csolve.net|CA

    euro1net.com|UK

    madamflod.net|SE

    could someone doublecheck the alamedanet.net? the whois.sc record says the ip location is in canada, but the registrant is in the USA. which do i take?

    edit: added some more.

  4. i have the 00 flag set to show a question mark. one showed up on a torrent, and the resolved ip was simply "kkreft.net". i mapped krefft.net to US, but when i refreshed µTorrent, the flag still didn't change. i also saw this with another peer, whose ip was "enorthhampton.com", which i tried to map to CA, but no results either. Is µTorrent unable to map ips that only have a web address? can anyone else repeat this?

  5. just a comment. all these people who love open source and stuff? how many of you can actually look at source code and figure out whether something is good or bad? and if you can't, have you found some respected authority that you trust that can tell figure it out for you? if µTorrent went open source it wouldn't matter to me at all because i'd have no clue what to do with it. i'd have to get someone else to interpret it for me, and i trust ludde to do that. i gather he's somewhat familiar with the code.

  6. i updated to that one when it came out because i thought it was an updated version of mine, but it was completely unrelated. :rolleyes:

    edit: was he really jackassy or something, 1c3d0g? i don't like using products made by jackassy people.

  7. i agree with eng about the aspect ratio. changing that will make flags look strange in proportion to one another, and leads to false conclusions about them. for example, that square red flag with the white cross looks really strange next to the others.

    having the flags all different sizes will also make the set as a whole look unprofessional, as if it's pieced together.

×
×
  • Create New...