Personally I love the idea with the new solution. Yeah, there might be a few more clicks involved - might even cost you a few seconds(!) of your life. But some of us really don't want every damn "label-location" to be subdirs of the same, central location. Under #nix we can tinker about with mounts as we wish, but I would guess most users are still on Windows. While tecnically possible there too, thats a whole different ball game. I for my part, have 4 different drives to sort stuff out to. RSS sorts some of the stuff out, but some always have to be labeled manually. And those, still go to different drives and directories.
Now only if we could have the option to send these ships straight to port...
...And labeled torrents would actually end up at their set destination, instead of global default location.
label rule system VS "Append the torrent's label to the directory name"
in General
Posted · Edited by pr0xZen
Personally I love the idea with the new solution. Yeah, there might be a few more clicks involved - might even cost you a few seconds(!) of your life. But some of us really don't want every damn "label-location" to be subdirs of the same, central location. Under #nix we can tinker about with mounts as we wish, but I would guess most users are still on Windows. While tecnically possible there too, thats a whole different ball game. I for my part, have 4 different drives to sort stuff out to. RSS sorts some of the stuff out, but some always have to be labeled manually. And those, still go to different drives and directories.
Now only if we could have the option to send these ships straight to port...
...And labeled torrents would actually end up at their set destination, instead of global default location.