shadek
-
Posts
140 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Downloads
Events
Blogs
Store
Everything posted by shadek
-
Is this project cancelled completely these days? After many years of use I still use it several times a day!
-
I've been a fan boy of µTorrent ever since it first was released, but I'm sticking with the old 1.6 version. Works excellent and is guaranteed to come without any myserious stuff.
-
shadek reporting in. i am away a lot, and my 1 gb connection home really is needed to be taken care of. i live here aprox. 4 days a week only. so that's 3 days where i cant do anything with my connection. that's how bad i need it. furthermore, im quite active in the µtorrent-community, and im always on the irc channel in case i'd notice a bug.
-
I've noticed the same thing. Sometimes the old file is still there.
-
This is true. I only wish I didn't have to force encryption mode.
-
Yeah, because as of right now, some BitComet-users leech the hell out of my initial seed of a 7 GB torrent.
-
µTorrent needs to implement a system which prevents the abuse of the 'super-seeding'-mode. BitComet abuses it. Bittornado already fixed this... would it be possible to see this in the comming release of µTorrent?
-
This is still on the frontpage: "the program itself is contained within a single executable less than 150 KB in size." THAT IS NOW WRONG. Correct would be less than 160 KB.
-
Nice work with the automatic read_cache-feature. When I click "search for updates" for the client version and when click "download translation", no new version or language translation can be found, or it doesn't say anything. Wouldn't it make a few things clear if the client tells me no new updates are available?
-
Only reason to release official 1.5 stable would be cuz the E and X flags would work better with more 1.5 µTorrent clients. The betas are incredibly stable. It's almost frightening.
-
Isn't that great? A client which actually get a lot of features between versions and is as good as bug free.
-
I really don't think µTorrent should adjust itself after Azureus. It's Azureus that should be fixed in the first place.
-
Yeah, overall ratio would kick ass. Green numbers if it's >1, red numbers if it's <1.
-
He, he. Alright!
-
A lot of new requests have emerged lately. Most of them deal with the statistics part. Many people want more things to be listed (total ratio etc). They also want a "reset to default" button instead of deleting the file which includes both statistics and settings. This shouldn't be too hard too implement before µTorrent 1.5. What do you think Firon? Are these ideas worthy enough to forward to Ludde?
-
I just downloaded another torrent of 4.5 GB. _2_ (2 MB in total) hashfails and probably 40% Azureuz 2.4.0.0 clients; I just can't see where the problem is?
-
428 works perfectly for me; the hashfail-problem has been fixed, totally.
-
No hashfail issues with build 428, 0.15% failed. I believe that's normal. 5 of the hashfails were from one peer that got banned:
-
I'm redownloading a similar torrent now. With 1.1 GB downloaded, only 1 hashfail of 4 MB. Looks better now. Must've been errors due to bad peers in the last torrent.
-
This is ridiculous. I got 25 hashfails (103.9 MB) when downloading a 4.45 GB torrent. This has never happened before. That's 2.33% wasted data. That is not acceptable. With beta 425, I had less than 0.1% wasted data each torrent. P.S. Each piece is 4 MB.
-
An automatic system would be cool.
-
I have experienced the reversed effect; speeds getting lower than normal. I really believe this option should be used when there are a ratio of less than 1:20 (seeds:peers).
-
Does your client report OK on the network part?