I found a pretty big bug with 1.83 and 1.82 (both latest versions incl. betas). I put in a port I wish to use in uT (say 61555), have disabled upnp and nat-pmp, my router indicates that uT will use port 61555 and will attempt many random ports as well. The net result according to my tomato 1.23 firmware's QOS graph, is that uT is now doing perhaps 60% of my upload bandwidth on some random ports (there are a whole bunch of them), and 40% on port 61555. This kills any QOS on the router since most QOS implementation depends on the source port you put in and expects the application to abide by the port chosen. uT 1.9.1x DOESNT have this bug. Can someone please look into this? In case you're wondering, yes my port is properly fowarded - I get a green arrow on bottom of uT. This issue only occurs for 1.82 and 1.83 but not for 1.9x