Syseval Posted June 27, 2006 Report Share Posted June 27, 2006 Tested on build 464:When you use a resolution of 5 seconds or more, numbers of reads/writes are not correct.You can't have 0.2 or 0.4 reads/writes. (You must not average numbers of reads/writes) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBear Posted June 27, 2006 Report Share Posted June 27, 2006 There seems to be no problem with 1.6 RC1 so maybe it's already been dealt with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Syseval Posted June 27, 2006 Author Report Share Posted June 27, 2006 Still there on 1.6 RC1...http://img45.imageshack.us/img45/8246/screen7qk.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bellicose Posted June 27, 2006 Report Share Posted June 27, 2006 I don't think that those readings are averaged. It's just that they are just being polled every interval. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Syseval Posted June 27, 2006 Author Report Share Posted June 27, 2006 ATM, at each interval: "Numbers of Reads/Writes" = sum of "Reads/Writes" divised by "resolutions"instead of: "Numbers of Reads/Writes" = sum of "Reads/Writes" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBear Posted June 27, 2006 Report Share Posted June 27, 2006 I see where you're coming from now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firon Posted July 1, 2006 Report Share Posted July 1, 2006 This isn't a bug, it's just showing you an average. .2 with an interval of 5s would be you had 1 write in a span of 5 seconds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Syseval Posted July 2, 2006 Author Report Share Posted July 2, 2006 Still a bug because it don't say "Number of reads/writes per second".But i prefer that it doesn't average, because the graph don't scale under "1". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.