Really unofficial todo

[Firon]

1. option to ban bitcomet/lord/spirit

2. improve the scheduler (more granularity, multiple limited speeds for different times of day, limited seeding mode)

3. put a per-torrent option to bypass scheduler

4. per-label/tracker options

5. add better seeding rules

6. editing the properties of multiple torrents at once

7. custom port blocks

8. make various RSS improvements http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?id=6302

9. add regex as alternative for RSS

10. add an option to download PROPER and RARFIX (which requires remembering the rss feed it got the original from)

11. allow range of ports

12. improve ipfilter to be fully compatible with eMule format

13. add support for %s in search engine

14. improve disk cache to automatically make finished pieces available in read cache

15. add secondary sorting to the various tabs

16. pause torrent for X minutes

17. fix this DFS thing http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?id=10901

18. make auto-load option that works like btmanycurses (remove a torrent from auto-load folder = remove from torrent list)

19. make "Put new downloads in" and auto-load check "Completed downloads" folder for already completed torrents too

for some future version...

1. console mode

2. command line switches for full control of program

3. linux version

4. finish UDP NAT traversal someday

5. find a way to get around the windows system cache like BC does

This is really really unofficial, ludde has not commented on ANY of these options. It's just I need a list of stuff to suggest to him.

Something being on this list is ZERO GUARANTEE that it'll ever get implemented.

[Game90]

how about Azureus DHT support?

[DonGato]

regex? ;

Wasn't that unwanted?

[Ultima]

Banning...? =|

[Enourmous Stilton]

Please consider suggesting these.

And why the change on banning Bitcomet? I thought that was always filed under 'never gonna happen'?

[Firon]

Azureus DHT is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too complex. Still not out of the realm of possibilities, but unlikely.

Ultima: automatic banning, not manual. And well, it's just something I've been mulling about. Plus BC gets on my nerves.

[Nefarious]

actually i've seen lately most of my best sharers are bitcomet users, i know bitcoemt is a lot of bad news, but is not always :/ bitlord/bitspirit, now that ones u can smash

[Firon]

It would be optional and not on by default if implemented.

[winMX_67]

YES # 7! Ive wanted to block port 80 for ages..no one needs to connect to that port.

[dAbReAkA]

for 1.6.1, here's a small todo..

...

...

for some future version:

24. find a way to get around the windows system cache like BC does

i think that improving the memory usage is more important than adding features like "16. pause torrent for X minutes"

[kokobaroko]

>22. linux version

YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!! :] yes yes yes

[tjobo]

What about changing the add-torrent dialog? Is it impossible?

http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?id=9017

[Ultima]

Firon, about the second list (for future versions)... start it from 1, otherwise you'll have to shift it every time you add something to the first list

/me hopes this thread doesn't become another feature request thread...

[Firon]

dAbReAkA: it's fine for 99.9% of the people, so it's a low priority issue.

And this isn't really a feature request thread. So don't bother requesting anything here.

[trinop]

> 19. make "Put new downloads in" and auto-load check "Completed downloads" folder for already completed torrents too

could you explain this a bit, not sure what you're saying

[Firon]

When you use "Put new downloads in" or "Auto-load torrents", it doesn't check the Completed data folder to see if the files exist. It only checks "Put new downloads in".

[dAbReAkA]

Firon, windows caches on all the systems.. that means that it takes extra memory that is unneed.. it just takes more for me than for u.. but it takes from both of us.. all will benefit from that one, mostly those 0.01%..

[Firon]

Windows cache works properly on the other 99.9% and is a GOOD thing. Every single Un*x OS does the same thing with extra RAM, and they're even more aggressive than Windows in taking memory.

[trinop]

ah, those missing quotes around autoload really threw me, now it seems so obvious

anyways, what sort of bribe would it take to get a move files command put on the todo list

[Allied]

Banning BitComet? There's got to be a thread explaining that bomb shell somewhere right? Can I get a link?

I'd search for it but what term would I use? "Bitcomet" "ban", too many results.

[edit]

24 hours and no response. Not even a comment like "search you lazy bastard!".

I'm going to assume this is an idle threat put forth by anti-BitComet trolls. Like when LimeWire threatens to ban Shareaza from the Gnutella network. More of a PR move that anything.

[dznutz]

yeah. it was probably proposed by that one guy who screams "bitvomit" every now and then.

[Firon]

Eh? No, I just put an option for doing that as part of my little todo. Like I said, nothing here's official.

[oo]

Read the post below.

Put your request in the wishlist thread.

[Ultima]

This thread isn't a feature request thread, though...

[sergiorodrigues]

YES # 7! Ive wanted to block port 80 for ages..no one needs to connect to that port.

i have had someone download from me more than 6GB on port 80.

i am sure that was the only solution the poor guy had to bypass his ISP.

i am sure when someone uses port 80, its not for fun...