MrBungle Posted July 2, 2006 Report Share Posted July 2, 2006 Can't seem to find an option for it. I have lot's of older torrents in my list and it was nice when any active ones shifted themself to the top of the list so I could see them at a glance. The new version seems to be lacking this? Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stone Posted July 2, 2006 Report Share Posted July 2, 2006 I think you just need to change sorting. Try sorting it by queue number ( # ). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultima Posted July 2, 2006 Report Share Posted July 2, 2006 So does it like... go to the top of the list when it's started, but back down when it's stopped? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrBungle Posted July 2, 2006 Author Report Share Posted July 2, 2006 Nah I tried queue number. The way it was before the update. They were all in alphabetical order, but if you started seeding something it auto went to the top of the list until you stopped it whereby it went back down to it's place in the list. Same with new torrents, they jumped to the top of the list while downloading - then went into the correct alphabetical slot when you stopped them. It was a nice little feature so you could glance at what was active without needing to switch to the active view. Thanks anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultima Posted July 2, 2006 Report Share Posted July 2, 2006 Sort by Status. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrBungle Posted July 2, 2006 Author Report Share Posted July 2, 2006 Yeah status is how I am doing it now. But even so, that's STILL not how it worked before the update. Shame Thanks anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultima Posted July 2, 2006 Report Share Posted July 2, 2006 Huh? Sorting hasn't even changed in the longest time, so I don't see how it could've changed unless you're sorting by a different column now. And sorting by Status works exactly how you describe, so I'm not sure what else to prescribe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrBungle Posted July 2, 2006 Author Report Share Posted July 2, 2006 OK, let me try and explain if I can. I had the list on the old version set to alphabetical order. Now, as soon as a torrent started, it went to the top of the list but the rest of the list stayed in alphabetical order. If a torrent was open, but NOT uploading or downloading because of lack of seeds or peers, it stayed in it's place in the list until such time as it had activity at which point it went to the top of the list. I liked how it did that as it let me check everything at a glance to see when they were "active" - but sorting by status puts all open torrents to the top of the list regardless of any activity on them or not. It's a subtle difference but one I am now missing from this latest build Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultima Posted July 2, 2006 Report Share Posted July 2, 2006 When it moved to the top, did it move up and down occasionally, or did it stay in place..? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrBungle Posted July 2, 2006 Author Report Share Posted July 2, 2006 Yeah some with very few peers or seeds would move up and down occasionally. Thanks for persisting with this by the way Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MechR Posted July 2, 2006 Report Share Posted July 2, 2006 Odd. I think what you're describing is sorting by "#", and it's still working on my end. Not sure why it's stopped working for you.For me, the program defaulted to sorting by Name when I downloaded 1.6, but clicking on the "#" column title changed it back. That isn't working for you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultima Posted July 2, 2006 Report Share Posted July 2, 2006 Nope, sorting by # doesn't do what he described.@MrBungle: You were probably sorting by download speed or upload speed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrBungle Posted July 3, 2006 Author Report Share Posted July 3, 2006 Nope, sorting by # doesn't do what he described.@MrBungle: You were probably sorting by download speed or upload speed.Doh - completely bloody obvious now you mention it!! Thanks for the help feel a bit of a pratt now! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.