artanis Posted October 14, 2006 Report Share Posted October 14, 2006 I would love if utorrent had an automatic way to install as a service. I will just do it manually for now... I have it running on a box where nobody logs in locally and I want it running all the time. The webui makes it perfect for running on a server.All of you who say "I dont need this so dont add it!" are ignorant jerks, but thanks for your input anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inacurate Posted October 18, 2006 Report Share Posted October 18, 2006 I don't know if anyone else said this or not, but there is one reason why I would like µTorrent to be able to run as a service:If my box crashes and reboots while I am not home, I want it to start up µTorrent in the background so I don't lose any seeding time! Inac Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
µtorrent-Guest Posted October 18, 2006 Report Share Posted October 18, 2006 "f my box crashes and reboots while I am not home, I want it to start up µTorrent in the background so I don't lose any seeding time!"no need for service for that goal!just tick the µT box to start on windows startup, and tell your windows to automaticly log in a user Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inacurate Posted October 19, 2006 Report Share Posted October 19, 2006 Which is fine Guest, if I want someone to be able to be sitting here after the power goes out and have access to my computer. Which is easier for me, checking a box that makes µTorrent a Window service, or ( assuming someone is computer saavy enough ) googling what I need to have windows log-on to a passworded account automatically, and then how to make it lock?Obviously, for the dev team not implementing the feature is easiest for them, but then we wouldn't be here talking if that was a realistic option for them, we prolly wouldn't even have this wonderful program. Inac Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lemur Posted November 5, 2006 Report Share Posted November 5, 2006 +1 I too would like to have uTorrent running in the background as a service. Currently using RDP to access a 'puter exposed outside of my SOHO router so it won't be hindered by low throughput through the router but having to keep an RDP session alive (even if disconnected) just doesn't feel right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
royk50 Posted November 8, 2006 Report Share Posted November 8, 2006 +1 would be greati am already running as as service with webui but had many many problems setting this up, it is VERY VERY USEFUL.already too much spoken as to why.thanks for the great super light weight program Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silverfire Posted November 9, 2006 Report Share Posted November 9, 2006 Google for srvany. And stop digging up old threads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rarosalion Posted March 12, 2007 Report Share Posted March 12, 2007 Sorry to dig up an old thread, but it seems that many of the points brought up in the past have been negated with windows vista.While I'm currently running uTorrent as a service on my Vista PC using srvany, it still doesn't give me access to the full uTorrent UI. Yes, I get the web interface, so basic torrent management is doable when running as a service - but vista now doesn't allow services to interact with the local user's desktop directly (one of the many new "security" features)What happens is (for those who don't have Vista) - you'll get the occasional prompt that says an application requires your attention (or words to that effect), and if you choose to respond, you get directed to a separate desktop in which uTorrent runs alone - you do what you have to do, then return to your normal desktop. There's no way of bringing up the uTorrent window without it "requesting your attention", and it doesn't run in the same desktop as the rest of your applications.I totally understand that introducing a native "run uTorrent as a service" option for XP was not needed (srvany did just fine!), but unless I'm missing something - users of vista may still require this feature. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McoreD Posted April 22, 2007 Report Share Posted April 22, 2007 There's no way of bringing up the uTorrent window without it "requesting your attention", and it doesn't run in the same desktop as the rest of your applications.[Window Title]Interactive services dialog detection[Main Instruction]A program can't display a message on your desktop[Content]The program may need information or permission to complete a task.Why does this happen?[^] Hide program details [show me the message] [Remind me in a few minutes][Expanded Information]Program(s) or devices(s) requesting attention.Message title: µTorrent 1.7 BETAProgram path: G:\Standalone\µTorrent\utorrent.exeReceived: Today, April 23, 2007, 5 minutes agoThis problem happens because of partial incompatibility with Windows Vista.Please contact the program or device manufacturer(s) for more information.That's true with FireDaemon as well. I was wondering how you manually bring up the uTorrent Service GUI because it doesnt create the Tray icon.Edit: Hi, I was wondering how do you get the Add New Torrent dialogBox of uTorrent while running it as a Windows Service. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chudycebu Posted August 20, 2007 Report Share Posted August 20, 2007 Just use WEBUI you can add it there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZiG0x Posted August 24, 2007 Report Share Posted August 24, 2007 Yes, I am agree to create a running as a service, but if the user activate this option. It's a good idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eejit Posted October 25, 2007 Report Share Posted October 25, 2007 I can see why running uTorrent as a service could benefit folk.At present I run uTorrent on my XP machine. I have set this up to automatically log me in to my account, then to switch users straight away. This allows all my applications to start up while denying access to my account.And this worked....................for a while.My problem is that I am away from home for weeks at a time, which is why I set this up and access it through WebUI. My kids are not keen on this as it interfereswith thier gaming. And they have found out how to stop my account logging in autonatically. Just hold the shift key when booting.So running uTorrent as a native service would be a dream come true and I desperately want it, but I can't see it happening.Why?Networking.I set up uTorrent using srvany, to run from my account and that part works. Problem is that, as far as I can tell, networking services start after log-in, so if you've got awireless network, you aren't going to have a network to access unless you login. Asyet, I have not figured out how to start the networking services before log-in.Should that be overcome, then that could raise possible other security issues such asrunning network services without firewalls etc. I'm not an expert in these fields so Icould be talking out my arse, but assuming I'm half correct, then the developers couldopen themselves up to a world of pain, because not every system is the same andimplementing this could be different on everyones set-up. Forums, such as this, couldbe inundated with "How do I get this to work...." etc.Until the time comes that these 'percieved' problems are addressed and uTorrent finallyhas the option to become a native service (Please, pretty please) I will continue withthe set up I've got and look to adding Scheduler as a service so I can reboot my systemautomatically periodically.Lastly, my thanks must go to the development team. Who I assume are affiliatedwith Carlsberg, because "uTorrent, probably the best program in the world"Cheers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fowl Posted November 18, 2007 Report Share Posted November 18, 2007 +1Running as a service is the way servers are supposed to work in windows.Implementing at least a basic version where only the webui would work, is simply a matter of handling a few new window messages.The next step from there would be a helper program associated with .torrent to upload torrents.To do it fully the GUI would have to be totally separated from the backend, with a network protocol for them to communicated. This would be ideal, but not required.Vote 1 for basic Native Windows Service support in 1.9! (or 1.8?) *hopeful smiley* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cludos Posted December 17, 2007 Report Share Posted December 17, 2007 +1I'd also like to see this feature implemented. I tried the alternative method (srvany) on a WinXP Pro box, but it didn't seem to work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whoa Posted January 20, 2008 Report Share Posted January 20, 2008 +1 for this feature.I tried the alternative method (srvany) on a WinXP Pro box, but it didn't seem to work.I got µTorrent running as a user defined service !The instructions on this page are better.WebUI is pretty much sufficient for administration. I only wish it worked better with Opera. It doesn't seem to favour anything but Firefox. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultima Posted January 21, 2008 Report Share Posted January 21, 2008 It doesn't favor any particular browser. It's tested on most modern browsers to make sure it's as cross-browser compatible as Directrix can make it. Of course, some browsers just suck (*cough*IE6*cough*), and others are limited in what they can do (Opera has limited support for right-click menus, and acts a bit weirdly with hotkeys). Not something Directrix can really do all too much about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bilbus Posted April 12, 2008 Report Share Posted April 12, 2008 how about security?if you could setup utorrent to run as a service i could set it up to run as a highly ristricted userIt would have access to the full access to the utorrent folder, read only to system folders and no access to network shares.Currently i have to run as a domain user, have it auto start and worry that if an exploit is found that the attacker would have full access to my system. If it was a service they would have access to just what the limited user has. Every serious 24/7 program runs as a service.not everyone runs windows in the workgroup enviroment ... fast user switching is not posable in a domain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roflcoin Posted July 9, 2008 Report Share Posted July 9, 2008 +1 still Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NanaFreak Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 i would really like this feature... i have a server that i remote desktop to (its not on my lan) and utorrent keeps closing when i dont connect to the same session everyday...running it as a service would be really good! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roflcoin Posted September 20, 2009 Report Share Posted September 20, 2009 +1 Still Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaiolav72 Posted October 18, 2009 Report Share Posted October 18, 2009 +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dehness Posted October 20, 2009 Report Share Posted October 20, 2009 YESSSSSSSSSSSS!! Thank christ someone else has already posted this, I would kill for this feature, for all the reasons already stated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
intricateenigma Posted December 10, 2009 Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 +1A very big +1. I've wanted this feature for years.I'd say more, but others who know what they're talking about have stated the reasons pretty well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ezalo Posted December 13, 2009 Report Share Posted December 13, 2009 +1My Atom based, 7x24, green and stuff computer would like this. Specially to recover from power failures and so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tstuber Posted July 22, 2010 Report Share Posted July 22, 2010 oh great, I'm looking for that feature.. the workarounds known in the web are not really proper solutions... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.