fluffylon Posted January 3, 2007 Report Share Posted January 3, 2007 Disk write caching is _disabled_ and cache size set to 260MB.After the write cache had gobbled up 287MB extra ("write statistics, cache: 287MB of 0.0KB") I stopped the download in a desperate attempt to keep the computer from crashing. To no avail. A little while later windows ran out of swap space as well and utorrent crashed. Taking the 287MB unsaved downloaded data with it down the drain of course.This isn't the first time this has happened. It seems like every time you've been just uploading for a while and the read cache is full (I'm not sure this is a requirement), starting a download really fucks things up. The downloaded data doesn't get written to disk but instead gets buffered in an ever-increasing cache (which you've told utorrent not to use for writes...) until either a) utorrent eventually starts writing the cached data to disk, or you run out of swap space and utorrent crashes. I have the same thing happening on two different computers, one running win2k sp4 and one running winxp sp2. Oh, and the upload gets cut off (drops to 0) while the write-cache hogging goes on.While there's no sign of a "Disk Overloaded" msg in the status bar, the problem does appear to have a connection to the phrase However, if this happens when adding a torrent, it is normal, and due to a design limitation in µTorrent, which will be fixed in the future, not because your disk is actually overloaded. It will disappear after a few minutes.in the FAQ. If that's the case, is there any ETA on a fix for this? It's very annoying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Switeck Posted January 4, 2007 Report Share Posted January 4, 2007 I want to say it's probably a firewall, "security suite", or overloaded hard drive causing the problem...but I just don't know as I don't have that problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fluffylon Posted January 4, 2007 Author Report Share Posted January 4, 2007 It's definitely not a firewall or security suite. Why would it be? Shouldn't be a disk problem either -- looks more like a flaw in utorrent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Switeck Posted January 4, 2007 Report Share Posted January 4, 2007 It really doesn't happen to enough other people to localize the problem, so most likely it is a software conflict.And is there even any software firewall or security suite on your computer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fluffylon Posted January 4, 2007 Author Report Share Posted January 4, 2007 System 1: only router (hw firewall), win2k.System 2: (another) router + win xp firewall.No security suites whatsoever.I really doubt it's a software conflict either as the two systems have pretty much nothing in common except utorrent. The win2k box doesn't even run much else apart from utorrent.I figure the fact that the write cache increases to 287MB (when it's set to be completely disabled) ought to give the developer a hunch as to what's going on.If that's the intended behaviour then there really should be a configurable hard limit that specifies the maximum memory utorrent is ever allowed to use. It's quite bad when it suddenly starts allocating several hundred megabytes extra (running out of swap space and causing a crash, no less). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Switeck Posted January 4, 2007 Report Share Posted January 4, 2007 I'll let someone else look into this. (Ultima please help!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultima Posted January 5, 2007 Report Share Posted January 5, 2007 lol I'd love to help, but it has me stumped as well. To be honest, this problem doesn't sound like a case of software conflict (though I can't be too sure). fluffylon's conclusion seems reasonable; whether it's correct, I don't know, since I don't know how the disk cache works in the situation as described above ;\ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.