Jump to content

A layout suggestion...


FOOOD

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 102
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I'm not sure that any new interface should look quite like that last suggestion - it's nice, but I still feel it's a little cluttered. However since I don't have any better ideas of my own (writing a new core for my website is taking all my creative energies at the moment!), I'll just keep my mouth shut for now :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.foood.net/images/other/drop/rows-1.jpg

that just looks plain sexy so much nicer GUI. i hate how i have to maximize it just so i can see all the info i would like. i would much rather be able to keep it as a small window in the middle of my desktop so that i can access other windows much easier.

Wow, that screenshot looks so good. I wish uTorrent would implement cetain parts from that concept shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

someone pointed out that it would be cool for µTorrent to implement XUL. I had no idea what it was, but then read this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XUL and it now makes sence

I would love to have that. I guess that would essentially make the app skinnable.

but, before you guys say anything, here are the concerns i have about this that i am sure a lot of people were going to bring up.

first, how much developer's reources will be required to make it happen? There are lot of things that are way more important to µTorrent then a pretty look

second, what would that do the memory footprint, and the resources used? Would it have a big impact? If so, it's not really worth it. But then again, i got 1GB of RAM, i'll spare a few extra MBs to make it look nice

third, would it still make the application just as simple. Meaning requires no installation and can run of a thumb drive?

discuss amongst yourselves

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, although FOOOD's ideas are very nice and I'd love to see them implemented, if it's going to bloat µTorrent, then it's better to leave the GUI as it is. :)

Personally, if I have to choose, I'd rather have responsiveness & small footprint over eye-candy and/or features...but if you only seek the latter, then you've found yourself another client. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

actually, i think azureus is much uglier then µTorrent

i like the simple interface

i've been an azureus user for a very long time, but it looks like that's getting unstalled very soon.

Same here, compare java vs gui standalone utorrent, utorrent is the supreme choice now.

Azureus is a memory resource eater that takes as much as 50mb of ram and do not perform much more than wht utorrent could. -.-"' utorrent need only about 98kb to get everything running and downloading 10 times better than Azureus.

Well about the skin, its nice very cool, if it can continue to be at 98kb or less than 200kb it would be the ultimate torrent in the world

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow' date=' I hadn't checked up on Acquisition for a while, and when I just checked the release notes... well, it seems that BitTorrent support is being added to Acquisition O.O

Yea, it's only in beta at the moment but should be good http://www.foood.net/images/other/smilies/yes.gif

Here's a rough example of what I mean including plus & minus buttons to reveal or hide more info. (Obviously the info could be moved around or added to. They're just to get the idea across).

http://www.foood.net/images/other/drop/rows-1.jpg

http://www.foood.net/images/other/drop/rows-2.jpg

I Like This Example .... not to be a bitch but MAC is not my FAV :D

BUT i LOVE THIS DESIGn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...