PerArne Posted May 19, 2007 Report Share Posted May 19, 2007 Agree that uTorrent is efficient. uTorrent has biggest "market share".I do not undertand what is the big advantage about the small file. uTorrent use limited computer resources but most users have computers with resources. I thought the limitation was the internet connestion and not the computer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultima Posted May 19, 2007 Report Share Posted May 19, 2007 The advantage isn't the filesize. µTorrent never has been about filesize -- it's always been about resource efficiency. The side-effect of it was that the filesize was small. In the end, it became something like a "tradition" to keep µTorrent as small as possible, but the devs never actually looked at it so seriously that filesize would limit what they added into µTorrent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smoovious Posted May 20, 2007 Report Share Posted May 20, 2007 and for the record, _most_ users run on "obsolete" equipment...even if they didn't, who wants to devote so many resources away on what is essentially, a file transferring utility? All that saved could go for other things... like frame-rate...-- Smoovious Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.