Honeyfrog Posted June 28, 2007 Report Share Posted June 28, 2007 #1. ...(edit: nevermind!)#2. In previous versions of uTorrent, if there was only one peer connected while in initial-seeding mode, he downloaded piece-after-piece at maximum rate -- which I like. In 2952, he gets one piece and then uTorrent won't send any more until a very lengthy delay (or until the peer disconnects and reconnects) -- this, IMO, is very undesirable in a new torrent since the new peer may just quit to come back a couple days later if he thinks the torrent will be a dog slow initial seed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firon Posted June 28, 2007 Report Share Posted June 28, 2007 Which build did this behavior change in? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honeyfrog Posted June 28, 2007 Author Report Share Posted June 28, 2007 I don't know. I only noticed it in 2952. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firon Posted June 28, 2007 Report Share Posted June 28, 2007 Can you try earlier builds to see when it started? I don't think this change was intentional, so it'd help to know when it broke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
funchords Posted June 29, 2007 Report Share Posted June 29, 2007 I thought the last build before 2999 was 2951 -- but in 2951 or whatever build came before 2999, the behavior I saw when Initial-Seeding was the expected behavior and not what the O.P. is reporting.Three ideas: #1. The peer is not indicating Interested in the next piece, or the peer is not requesting if unchoked.#2. ISP interference is blocking the have messages. The peer is reconnecting because the ISP sent a "RST" (e.g. Comcast's P2P management).#3. The peer is Mainline 5.0.7 which has a bug affecting Super-Seeding Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultima Posted June 29, 2007 Report Share Posted June 29, 2007 2952 was a typo, in case you were wondering (it was 2951 before 2991 which was before 2999 ). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Norton Posted June 29, 2007 Report Share Posted June 29, 2007 Yeah - I tried to reproduce it several times with uT clients and didn't have much luck... doesn't mean for 100% certainty that it isn't there though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honeyfrog Posted June 29, 2007 Author Report Share Posted June 29, 2007 (started another bug-report) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.