neosheep Posted November 24, 2005 Report Posted November 24, 2005 simply put.Let say you are allowed a certain download / upload capacity per month. A nice features would be able to monitor the total download or upload within that month , and if too close to the max stop all activities. Then at a certain date (each month,week,or ..etc) re-enable the clienta simple command line would do the trick at maxcap() close client then windows schedual task (if utorrent != open) utorrent /start
ColdArmor Posted November 25, 2005 Report Posted November 25, 2005 if someone messed with that option they would get really freaked out when their client suddenly closes.
neosheep Posted November 25, 2005 Author Report Posted November 25, 2005 true but implimented well it could be VERY usefull so ppl dont overkill then monthly download usage and pay extra on billsjust like stoping when total download in month is 20gigs
criscr0ss Posted November 30, 2005 Report Posted November 30, 2005 not everyone has a dl cap if you do then get another montior, utorrent is to download/upload torrents not a network monitor..useless feature imo, those that need it can use something else
neosheep Posted November 30, 2005 Author Report Posted November 30, 2005 its not useless cause i want to stop the utorrent software to be able to manage my download and without offence there is nothing on the market that can shutdown a software when a certain other software has acheived a certain upload data stream.also usual monitoring software are for a nic card thus if i stream the torrent from my media center (which is my download machine) then my upload download is wrong cause most of the data was send to my other computer and not the external networkbut i would wish to be able to have the luxury of a non-monitor connection but seems like its something my only isp doesnt supportthanks you
silverfire Posted November 30, 2005 Report Posted November 30, 2005 From what I understand, most home ISP's are not capped, so making one small feature to cater to the 1% or 2% of people that need/want it counts as bloat in my book. If a utility exists to monitor traffic through certain ports you might be able to do it, though.
Godfoster Posted February 4, 2006 Report Posted February 4, 2006 Actually, this feature would be very useful to most people using school ISPs, as it is common for schools to place a bandwidth limit on student's access points. Also, this may be more practical if it were more similar to the "Seed While" option in the Seeding Priority section of µTorrent's Preferences. Instead of checking for a ratio, however, it could apply a rule (and interface) such asTorrent While * (checkbox) Downloaded is: <= xxx MB * (checkbox) Uploaded is: <= xxx MBWhen Torrent has reached the bandwidth limit * (checkbox) Limit the download rate to [use 0 to stop downloading]: xx kB/s * (checkbox) Limit the upload rate to [use 0 to stop uploading]: xx kB/sIt shouldn't be that difficult to compare the set values to the ones displayed in the "Downloaded" and "Uploaded" fields already used in µTorrent.That aside, µTorrent is awesome, way better than any of the other clients out there.
Switeck Posted February 7, 2006 Report Posted February 7, 2006 Which "total" bandwidth is to be displayed by µTorrent?Every packet into and out of the computer?All the above minus LAN traffic?(If so, you are asking µTorrent to "spy" on everything done on your computer.)Every packet created and received by µTorrent?Only upload/download of torrents by µTorrent?
Godfoster Posted February 14, 2006 Report Posted February 14, 2006 Advocating that a feature be added to µTorrent which is similar to spyware/malware is ridiculous, and I would never suggest something like that. I merely suggested that µTorrent be able to monitor its own traffic, and have the ability to create torrent rules based on this.I believe that neosheep's original suggestion was to give µTorrent the ability to monitor all of its traffic at once (all of its torrent traffic, instead of just monitoring one torrent) so that one could avoid going over their allocated bandwidth for a certain time period. My suggestion was similar, but instead required the user to set a "bandwidth" rule, sort of like the "seeding rules".
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.