arctree Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 Nope, not according to Wikipedia it isn't which is news to me.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BitTorrent_clientTake a look. Apparently its ment to be chargable software..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DreadWingKnight Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 Nice of whoever made that edit to think out of their ass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jewelisheaven Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 I don't think I get DWKnight's colloquialism, but yes I guess uT is too popular to have the ONLY downside to using it (when compared to that large list of competing clients) being that it doesn't run on OS X. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultima Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 When they say Free, they're referring to the FSF's hijacked definition of the word Free. µTorrent is still freeware (without any plans to change that); it's just not what the FSF considers to be Free software. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jewelisheaven Posted January 17, 2008 Report Share Posted January 17, 2008 Also note only the top header was changed to "Free software", the others still say as before "FOSS". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.