jewelisheaven Posted April 14, 2008 Report Share Posted April 14, 2008 I don't normally comment on the idiocy which is... bullying, however:http://www.news.com/Microsoft-Vista-feature-designed-to-annoy-users/2100-1016_3-6237191.htmlThe fact an exec would even COMMENT on this is a sign Microsoft needs to be hit over the head.... soon.Maybe someone should steal the proposed bid for Yahoo.... or not. Two wrongs don't make a right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTHK Posted April 14, 2008 Report Share Posted April 14, 2008 I saw this via Ars in Thunderbird via RSS, I find it interesting that they/he says it's to get apps to be ok in running user mode instead of admin mode. Doesn't that make sense? I mean, I tried running user only once on XP, it was quite annoying, and yet it's recommended for security purposes, to prevent viruses from having admin privileges from the start. Though with an elevation bug, it doesn't matter as much at that point . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firon Posted April 14, 2008 Report Share Posted April 14, 2008 It has its benefits. There's no reason to always need to run as admin, which is exactly what you have to do on XP. On Vista, it's actually possible to run as a regular user , though you still need to admin up every so often. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultima Posted April 16, 2008 Report Share Posted April 16, 2008 If UAC didn't warn users about a range of actions, then it would be even more useless. The fact of the matter is, too many developers take for granted the fact that many users are running under administrator accounts -- that's a dumb assumption to make.Microsoft made the mistake before of having administrator accounts be default, which (in turn) caused developers to be lazy. If Microsoft doesn't grab the matter by the horns and do something about it, they're making another mistake -- yes, indeed, two wrongs don't make a right.It's annoying now, but if developers get the message, then it'll only be beneficial for users in the future (and less annoying too). Granted, I don't know too well how annoying UAC is (or what actions really require UAC confirmation), since I've had limited exposure to Vista, but IMO, something's gotta give. I don't see Microsoft's decision to step in (and realize their past mistake in design) as anything too particularly wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.