boo Posted February 22, 2006 Report Share Posted February 22, 2006 maybe it needs to be tested more before it becomes public. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shadek Posted February 22, 2006 Report Share Posted February 22, 2006 428 works perfectly for me; the hashfail-problem has been fixed, totally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dAbReAkA Posted February 22, 2006 Report Share Posted February 22, 2006 it happened to be a Az problem (the hashfails thing).. nothing to do with utorrentalthough there was a bug related to hashfails in 426 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krazyson Posted February 22, 2006 Report Share Posted February 22, 2006 when will 428 come out i would like check it out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultima Posted February 22, 2006 Report Share Posted February 22, 2006 Hm... odd... the Azureus thing wasn't fixed in a public release, so if µTorrent wasn't the problem, then the hashfails should still be occurring. Maybe both clients had some problems. Oh well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dAbReAkA Posted February 22, 2006 Report Share Posted February 22, 2006 maybe they're still occuring Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultima Posted February 22, 2006 Report Share Posted February 22, 2006 If what Firon said earlier still holds, then that's my hunch as well... maybe shadek is making his claim prematurely ;P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shadek Posted February 22, 2006 Report Share Posted February 22, 2006 I just downloaded another torrent of 4.5 GB. _2_ (2 MB in total) hashfails and probably 40% Azureuz 2.4.0.0 clients; I just can't see where the problem is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted February 22, 2006 Report Share Posted February 22, 2006 And back to the hash-fail problem - My guess is that it has to do with the new the Protocol Header Encryption . I tried to disable it - and it seemed to almost totally eliminate the hash-fails !!!I suggest that you guys, do the same and report back here.My theory is - that one of the Az or uT versions (either the current ones or an older one, like uT B426...) might be causing the problem. So, even if YOU are OK, you may be effected by the other side. So, help the swarm and report back!!!Well, nothing much to add to the above quote (except I told you so... )Development of new communication protocols/encryption is not a simple task. Being compatible to both a standard as well as each other - was achieved remarkably fast. Glitches are expected, and will be resolve in time... Touché* for ludde !!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultima Posted February 22, 2006 Report Share Posted February 22, 2006 I believe you mean "touché" ;P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted February 22, 2006 Report Share Posted February 22, 2006 Yep... a bug... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dAbReAkA Posted February 22, 2006 Report Share Posted February 22, 2006 touché? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firon Posted February 22, 2006 Author Report Share Posted February 22, 2006 Just gotta wait for the next Az release to fix the issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hofshi Posted February 22, 2006 Report Share Posted February 22, 2006 you still got to hand it to the Az team - the released a good stable release in practically no time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
osm0sis Posted February 23, 2006 Report Share Posted February 23, 2006 when will 428 come out i would like check it out well it's not exactly hard to get hold of Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nefarious Posted February 23, 2006 Report Share Posted February 23, 2006 well, not exactly, but still there mustt be some reason it isnt... announced Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Technarch Posted February 23, 2006 Report Share Posted February 23, 2006 Cool, the new version has a 'disk overloaded' message on the status bar. Lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nefarious Posted February 23, 2006 Report Share Posted February 23, 2006 now that u meantion it, where did Network OK go?i've been downloading a torrent for like an hour or so, and i see no Network OK, or any connection message oh, loaded a bigger swarm torrent, and then it worked, why didnt it show before? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
osm0sis Posted February 23, 2006 Report Share Posted February 23, 2006 i wasn't getting a Network OK in 427 for awhile there, i figured it was because i just switched back to my home network (i'm home from school for the break). I am getting one now with 428.it not being announced may just be a matter of the site not being updated yet. either ludde or firon usually does it, so the files often wait in the beta folder until one or the other has time to update the site. perhaps that's the case now. also, this beta has a changelog. in the past the ones that didn't get announced didn't have changelogs. so maybe this one breaks with pattern, but it's probably more likely that it's just waiting on a site update. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StoicJester Posted February 23, 2006 Report Share Posted February 23, 2006 network ok doesn't appear until you load a large swarm torrent and receive an incoming connection. with no torrents or torrents with small swarms, Network OK won't appear but your configuration is still fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultima Posted February 23, 2006 Report Share Posted February 23, 2006 @Technarch: I'm not sure if you were being sarcastic, but if you weren't, I'll just tell you that the "Disk Overload" message has been around for a while. See if this thread helps you.Edit: Interestingly, I just saw that message for the first time as well (b428)... and I was only downloading at ~40KB/s... Oh well, I'll deal and live =P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted February 23, 2006 Report Share Posted February 23, 2006 are you, guys, talking about stuff related to the non-public (private) beta ? since it is confusing, I suggest to note it clearly... (BTW - I don't have/use it, until it is released to the "public" ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultima Posted February 23, 2006 Report Share Posted February 23, 2006 Point taken, and noted above. I'm pretty sure Technarch was talking about b428, as was osmosis (clearly ;P) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
osm0sis Posted February 23, 2006 Report Share Posted February 23, 2006 rafi, such restraint i prefer the ones with potentially more kinks worked out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boo Posted February 23, 2006 Report Share Posted February 23, 2006 nice, build 428 has been made public Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.