emc Posted September 25, 2009 Report Share Posted September 25, 2009 Rafi,your situation is when the speedtest check box is disabled. Then port at Connection was really changed until speed guide is opened again. I did not test which port is used for p2p connection. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdamK Posted September 25, 2009 Report Share Posted September 25, 2009 emc: Fixed in 16665 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firon Posted September 26, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 26, 2009 New build up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyosung Posted September 26, 2009 Report Share Posted September 26, 2009 Having seen teh changelog now, safe to assume that torrent creation is a.o.k on Vista/7 machines? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vchat20 Posted September 26, 2009 Report Share Posted September 26, 2009 Looks good on this end for torrent creation. Assuming it was an OS-agnostic bug as it was affecting my XP machine as well as my Win7 laptop. Both are creating fine now though with build 16666. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyosung Posted September 26, 2009 Report Share Posted September 26, 2009 ^Alright thanks, shall give it another go then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted September 26, 2009 Report Share Posted September 26, 2009 Still some small issues with the setup/speed guide (5):1* the # of peers per torrent for UL speeds @2M and above are smaller then the # @1.5M . Probably a typo error... 2* "connection failed: incorrect function" what does it mean ? 3* I think there is a flaw in the recommendation logic: If selects the table item closest to the results, but ABOVE them. You might consider selecting the table "line" just BELLOW them, so there it will not create anomalies like the example here: http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?pid=429245#p4292454* changing the port # should enable the "save & close" button5* GUI logic: - do not run any test - select any UL value ("save" enabled) - go back to "test-results" "save" still enabled... and you can set all '0' as your settings. "save" should be re-disabled for "test-results" selection until any valid test results are available.*6 and... unfortunately - a system reset caused by a speed test (Win XP crash dump): http://www.mediafire.com/?exnxumsz1evand some comments: a. why not just use the standard "Apply/OK/cancel" notation for buttons instead of "save & close" which means - "OK" + the "run test" ? ...b. why not add a ping latency test to the test-server and display it ? this way it can assist in assessing the reason for the test results being crappy (some times... ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTHK Posted September 26, 2009 Report Share Posted September 26, 2009 a system reset caused by a speed test (Win XP crash dump):Kerio firewall fail, and SP2 gives you a 2x score multiplier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted September 26, 2009 Report Share Posted September 26, 2009 well. 1x/6 ... what is "2x score multiplier" ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moogly Posted September 26, 2009 Report Share Posted September 26, 2009 Was it a BSOD with Kerio Firewall during the speedtest? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted September 26, 2009 Report Share Posted September 26, 2009 no, as I wrote it was a system hard reset. And I didn't say it was Kerio's fault, GTHK did. I still suspect uTorrent, even if inderectly... and an UL limiter issue: It seems that with net.calc_overhead=true iא does not obey the UL limit. at least with "nerrow" line bandwidth.By rafi_d Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moogly Posted September 26, 2009 Report Share Posted September 26, 2009 I said that because Kerio is known to be the source of many BSOD, with or without uT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted September 26, 2009 Report Share Posted September 26, 2009 It's version 2.1.5 , the 'good' free version... before the messed it up ... but who knows... maybe it IS Kerio's fault... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anonymous1 Posted September 26, 2009 Report Share Posted September 26, 2009 @ rafi - even when "net.calc_overhead" is set to "true", uT1.9&2.0 still didnt respect selected upload limit and overwrite it about 2x...I hope this bug is on red list and have high priority and of course will be fixed in final xD@ pestbest - thx ;p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twipley Posted September 26, 2009 Report Share Posted September 26, 2009 This is a very good build, indeed. However, thank God there are bugs, because you developers would have no job at all, besides adding new features and stuff. Well, you might at times wish there were no surfacing bugs, but that's another thing... Here's a quick bug report: in the setup guide, the "save & close" button remains disabled even if "automatic port mapping" gets ticked or unticked. Isn't that abnormal?Yours,twipley Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ichpuchtli Posted September 27, 2009 Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 16666 is "sending" packets with 1506 bytes (cable, 1500 MTU), second to WireShark when seeding/uploading via uTP (just 1 connection/peer at 0,2 - 5kB/s)But when connected to another distant peer, sends packets from 120 to 300 bytes max only (uTP).Is this expected?[WinXP-Pro-SP3, Cable PPPoA 4Mbit/600kbit, SBV5120 modem, RTL8139/810x nic) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lamsoft Posted September 27, 2009 Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 I've got this problem.... while using /RECOVER switch.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honeyfrog Posted September 27, 2009 Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 I just upgraded 1.84 to the most recently-listed 2beta, and I'm receiving far fewer connected peers than previously. Example: public DHT-enabled torrent with three html and three udp trackers (html one listed first), 160 peers.While seeding as a 100% seeder, I previously I had approximately thirty connected while behind a Comcast server firewall which prevents port-forwarding. Upon upgrading, only a couple connected. Upload speed to them was very slow, and eventually they disconnected and did not return.Only Bitcomet peers seemed able to connect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrebrait Posted September 27, 2009 Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 I think the setup guide should allow you to Test you connection speed and then configure uTorrent automaticallyANDLet you choose mannually in case you don't want to test anything or the tests fail or are unsuitable for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jivan Posted September 27, 2009 Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 um, I have build 16546 and it doesn't see the update Its been 2 days now. Guess would have to do it manually. Any ideas anybody?guys I tried one more thing, dunno why it isn't successful . I tried to add a tracker to a .torrent but it didn't succeed. The .torrent file was already put up on the other site. Any ideas or suggestions would be nice. I also have one more query/question but its more generic in nature. Does ISP peering have any effect on bittorrent?Also is there some flag which I can turn on so can serve those people who are geographically nearer to me first then far? I know that both the questions don't mean the same. I could have a peer who's geographically closer but to serve him/her I have to go through 10 hoops around the world in which case it would make sense to serve somebody sitting in the US or elsewhere. One bug though :- Maybe its been reported before or not. In the earlier releases, one could update the trackers on the fly (meaning while the torrent files were seeding). Now this is greyed out. I do not know whether that's part in due to some changes at the private trackers though. Any ideas and suggestions on the same would be good. DreadWingKnight can you suggest where I can read a bit more multitracker torrents. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdamK Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 Rafi:1: I'll ask Firon to take a look at the presets.2: "Incorrect Function": I'm looking into this.3: Recommendation logic: Yes, it's still using the old algorithm. Expect the new algorithm in the next refresh4: I'm going to change how this works.5: Test results: I'm going to only add this menu item after a successful test result6: I'll check that crash dumpVirtual_ManPL: It's on the list. It has not been scheduled yet.lamsoft: I can't see your screenshotHoneyfrog: Is the situation the same with previous 2.0 betas? Can you try one or two versions back?andrebrait: It does - you can still select different settings after the test. Better dialog wording coming.Thanks All Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anonymous1 Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 @ AdamK - thanks, now I can stop spamming about this annyoing issue xD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatever Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 Do you guys realize that when you post dumps (i.e. .DMP files), you usually reveal private information? Things like your Windows user name, torrent, path and file names, programs installed/running, and some other things? Those things are stored in string form right in the dump files; anyone can see it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DreadWingKnight Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 And if you don't post the dumps, bugs won't get fixed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firon Posted September 29, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 That's largely why I ask people to email the dumps now, assuming they don't just submit it in the client.The dumps are necessary for development. Without them, we can't fix crashes (or other bugs). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.