guijarrelson Posted August 9, 2009 Report Share Posted August 9, 2009 I have some files uploading, and I have set the upload limit in a manual mode in 25kb/s, but uTorrent upload to 32kb/s. I think it could be a problem with the limit bandwith.Greets! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bt22 Posted August 9, 2009 Report Share Posted August 9, 2009 @jivanprivate trackers have anticheat scripts and could detect the event bug as a cheat@guijarrelsonis net.calc_overhead enabled?if so the extra upload may be protocol overheadremember utp transfers use more of it than tcp ones Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zarggg Posted August 9, 2009 Report Share Posted August 9, 2009 Have the tracker bugs been identified yet, or do you still need a list of trackers that aren't playing nice along with the errors? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ma7amed Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 There is torrents was working in version 1.8 and it is failure in version 2 !!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jivan Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 ma7amed, I have the same issue on one of the torrents as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Surfer56 Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 I have very high CPU load with 2.0 beta 16081:http://img18.imageshack.us/i/53257071.png/http://img32.imageshack.us/i/87471159.png/And compare with 1.7.7(same torrents):http://img18.imageshack.us/i/65570394.png/Why so differ ?CPU Athlon 64 3000+ (1809 Mhz)Memory 1GbWinXP SP3 Pro 32bit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DreadWingKnight Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 Compare to 1.8.3 or we don't care. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arash70 Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 Network / UPnP tests are good but the Speed test sucks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Surfer56 Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 DreadWingKnight1.8.3 have same result with 1.7.7 on same torrents http://img190.imageshack.us/img190/3614/61274286.png Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pjde Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 I've been using v1.9 build 1538 for some time now and it's been working very well with both TCP and uTP uploading and downloading (via my German ISP).I changed to v2.0 build 16081 and immediately a couple of my torrents received "Corrupt Torrent - Please Delete" error messages from the tracker (as highlighted in posts #5, #13, etc of this topic). Adding new torrents (from Demonoid.com) resulted with this error message with each attempt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bailystevens Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 I can't actually run the Ctrl + G set up guide due to my screen res.Bit of a Problem, It won't actually fit. I'm on a Samsung NC10 Netbook with a res of 1024 x 600.Might need fixing for the next build, as many people won't be able to run it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Debiloid Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 http://rapidshare.de/files/48082492/16081-utorrent.f540.rar.htmlcrashed when uploaded over 10 megabytes/s to local peer + 2 dumps after my VPN connection canceled and my IP changed to another (I have 2 fully static )))) all 3 dumps on sendspace.com deleted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Surfer56 Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 I don't know, submitted this dumps or not by programm, uploaded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdamK Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 Hi All,A couple tips about attaching files:If there is only one file, please don't archive it - the web servers will handle the compression.Also, regarding Rapidshare: I need my eyes to be able to program. So please avoid that one if you can.Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jlells01 Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 Have been using uTorrent for awhile - decided to go ahead and download the beta to help out the community. Everything has been great - with one notable exception...The new "speed test" feature is reporting inaccurate upload speeds of 52 kB/s (from all test servers).If I go directly to the MLab site, it's accurate:Here's another for reference:Regardless of this, THANKS for making a great program! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobince Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 the error only occurs when tracker has format http://...:.../xxxxx...xxxxxx/announceThat is the format used by XBT trackers. XBT is used by many of the higher-traffic private sites. It doesn't like µTorrent 2.0b's omission of the parameter 'event=started' to the initial contact with the announce URI.According to theory.org's version of the BitTorrent specification, it is right to: "started: The first request to the tracker must include the event key with this value". The version at bittorrent.org doesn't say the same so clearly, but the implication is certainly there. Needs fixing.Is there a workaround for the "HTTP Error 404" bug?Not as far as I can see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seed.helper Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 thank you very mutchthis new version passes the TS that my isp does for now weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee but now i having a few issues that is error from tracker http 404...thank you once againcheersdavid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ichpuchtli Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 Thanks: bobince, hugootto, bt22Nice explanations and good recommendations! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Polymathlete Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 The beta has SIGNIFICANTLY improved my upload speed.My download speed is a little lower, but great job with the beta overall>Can"t wait til it's official. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firon Posted August 10, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 New build out to fix the tracker bugs. See first post! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seed.helper Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 for now solved the problem with the trackerso fastthanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seyss Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 Automatic Upload Rate Is Gone And Not Documented In This Latest Beta!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bt22 Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 That is the format used by XBT trackers. XBT is used by many of the higher-traffic private sites. It doesn't like µTorrent 2.0b's omission of the parameter 'event=started' to the initial contact with the announce URI.you're basically right! but the problem is that the beta sends event=completed instead of started, and event=started instead of completedi think this is causing the 404 error. i didn't try it at demonoid but it's most likely causing the corrupt torrent issue, unless there's something different on how v2 reports the info_hash, but in that case you'd get "torrent not registered with this tracker".if the bittorrent team fixed this event problem it'd be great, i need v2's utp and nat hole punching features. thanks in advance, thumbs up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirinya Posted August 11, 2009 Report Share Posted August 11, 2009 a problem i noticed was that setting the download limit to UNLIMITED actually limits the speed to around 10 kB/sEDIT: my problem only lasted for a while. now, the unlimited download limit works normally Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Surfer56 Posted August 11, 2009 Report Share Posted August 11, 2009 Same problem with CPU load on 16126 build Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.