Jump to content

µTorrent 2.0 released


Firon

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 659
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

issues making large torrents around 4gb or more a piece will fail to be properly done so when seeding people get 99.8 or 99.9 of a torrent force rechecking will show the bad piece and file i have had this issue many times now may help to point out i am using winxp sp3 i am certian tech support can recreate this issue for examing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bugs:

- when a torrent download is in progress setting a low download limit - might just stop all the downloads

- download overhead - is being underestimated

- displayed speed #s are not including the overhead as was in RC2 (calc_overhead = true). PS: I understand it's by design)

- speed values are lower then the real speeds, measured by external tool

- seeding speeds close to 0 with uTP only peers.

more and some screenshots - over here: http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?pid=445669#p445669

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DreadWingKnight:

depends on your bt.transp_disposition settings.

i know that, but i thought that, on default settings, utp connections between 2.x and 1.x users are via old header, and between 2.x via new header. but it seems that is not the case.

transition to a new header, ones when 2.0 is out and stable; how is going to happen?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I testing to download many torrent, download speed too slow, especially when load from P2P Cache of my ISP which using BitComet 1.09.

What real meaning of "Bandwidth Management". It's uTP?

1.8.5 have uTP too, It's work fine so I hope 2.0 work fine too soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I try upload limit from 10-90KB It's nothing difference.

I using 10/1Mb

Normaly speed about 900KB-1MB form cache on 1.8.5 but when I using 2.0 RC1-3 It's drop down to 300-600KB.

One thing why country flag on peer missing. (peer resolve = true) I think RC2 It's still have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually everytime I limit upload speed on 10KB, It's slow speed when limit upload on 30-90KB but I'm not bad guy So I'm use alternate upload when not downloading = 0. I use this method because I can't wait to using file which download slow speed when upload limit more than 10KB.

Please understand me.

In 2.0 upload limit 10KB can affect on download speed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I try upload limit on 60KB, It's still slow about 300-800KB.

When I back to 1.8.5, It's work fine 1MB at least.

Have cache peer on both test and I think even if no cache, It's still slow.

I'm not try bt.tcp_rate and net.calc yet.

Look like 2.0 upload speed better 1.8.5 on unlimited upload.(80-100KB/60-80KB)

...

Tesing 6 times with 71MB torrent, on unlimited upload and download.

bt.connect = 5, bt.transp = 15 and all settings are same.

1.8.5(17414) - 01.41 m on longest.

2.0(RC3) - 02.59 m on longest.

1.8.5 load speed with cache peer(27%) 1-1.1MB to 30% then drop down speed to 800-900KB.

2.0 load speed with cache peer(27%) 200-600KB to 30% then drop down speed to 500-600KB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This test-torrent/file (?) is much too small for a 10M connection testing. You should write your upload speeds as well . and using the recommended settings (calc_overhead + upload limit) is much advised.

EDIT:

I couldn't get RC3 with uTP only (trans_disposition = 10) to seed anything.. :(

FYI!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think my test enough for this because I test 6 times and result with no difference.

"You should write your upload speeds as well" - unlimited up and down.

One thing I'm not strong in English, sorry for this.

...

When testing upload rate 15-20KB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bt.connect = 5, bt.transp = 15 and all settings are same.

Torrent size - 4.35GB

1.8.5(17414)

185r.png

10.01 m elapsed.

2.0(17875)

54230553.png

20.49 m elapsed.

1.8.5(17414)

1852.png

30.49 m elapsed.

2.0(17875)

202o.png

40.49 m elapsed.

2.0(17875)(tcp rate=false)

203b.png

204hp.png

50.49 m elapsed.

1.8.5

609MB 10m

634MB 10m

2.0

597MB 10.48m

539MB 10m

523MB 10m

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...