DreadWingKnight 310 Report post Posted May 18, 2010 If you disable uTP, you don't connect to anyone who is set to uTP only.You still connect to any with TCP enabled in any way. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
heidelberg23 0 Report post Posted May 19, 2010 @rafi: Yep, uTP creates a great many overhead traffic and PPS. Many russian ISPs blocked uTP traffic because of high PPS. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nivaldin 0 Report post Posted May 19, 2010 what is PPS? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
heidelberg23 0 Report post Posted May 19, 2010 @nivaldin: Packets Per Secondhttp://www.cisco.com/web/about/security/intelligence/network_performance_metrics.html Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rafi 185 Report post Posted May 19, 2010 @booze/nivaldin: as a compromise, you can still allow only incoming uTP connections (B-4a in my sig) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
booze 0 Report post Posted May 19, 2010 Ok thanks guys, don't really care if i can't connect to uTP only clients so that's no problem. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zarggg 0 Report post Posted May 19, 2010 I find it funny how I still get full bandwidth utilization on well-seeded torrents with good trackers (i.e., *nix distros) even with uTP and net.calc_overhead turned on, and decent speeds (~200 - 600kB/s on average) on other torrents.Are all you naysayers implying I'm going insane and am not actually downloading at 1200kB/s (10Mbit)? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
eliot_cougar 1 Report post Posted May 19, 2010 I still don't see the BEP22 fix Greg Hazel has made long ago... It prevents Windows to use its DNS cache system which returns NETBIOS name on FQDN request... (Stupid Win) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rafi 185 Report post Posted May 20, 2010 is advanced->isp.bep22 true ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
eliot_cougar 1 Report post Posted May 20, 2010 Ofcourse it's enabled... I'm talking about this bug: http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?pid=469446#p469446It's Windows-specific, if you try to get FQDN for your own machine like this:socket.gethostbyaddr('your.own.ip.addr') or this socket.getfqdn('your.own.ip.addr')Windows will return your NETBIOS name instead...We have found that you have to set additional flag DNS_QUERY_WIRE_ONLY to force Windows to bypass cache and do real DNS request... Greg has wrote some advanced code to make that work, but it still doesn't seem to be included in the latest revisions... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bence 0 Report post Posted May 21, 2010 hi,I have to use uTP only, my isp seems to block my connections if i use tcp too. All is well this way but overhead is kinda huge. Is it any better in the alpha? (2.1)I'm fine with this anyway, just asking. (by huge i mean around 30% or more sometimes)thanks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rafi 185 Report post Posted May 21, 2010 Nope. 2.1 has the same uTP code. I confirmed this long time ago. It seem to be by design. Some tweaks are in my sig, but are mostly ineffective. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
fowl 0 Report post Posted May 22, 2010 "Transferred last 31 days" in statistics dialog is actually showing downloads (what I selected in transfer cap).[2010-05-20 02:02:07] Banned 85.241.123.29:52711: [µTorrent 2.0.1 (100.0)]: -UT2010-0K%7c%3c7%d4%26%d3%1f%b5z%92 (448 kB downloaded, 64.0 kB bad)[2010-05-20 02:09:45] Banned 75.110.149.140:25823 [uTP]: [µTorrent 2.0.2 (100.0)]: -UT2020-%c0L%b8%b8W%2f%ee%2a9%ef%ec%0b (80.0 kB downloaded, 64.0 kB bad)[2010-05-20 02:10:03] Banned 143.167.185.128:58825: [µTorrent 2.0.1 (100.0)]: -UT2010-0K%c7%a8%f0b%3asP%c1%d5X (960 kB downloaded, 64.0 kB bad)[2010-05-20 02:11:57] Banned 74.89.102.136:55076 [uTP]: [µTorrent 2.0.1 (100.0)]: -UT2010-0K%c6%cfE%22%3b%9e2%cf-%ba (5.18 MB downloaded, 64.0 kB bad)[2010-05-20 02:14:22] Banned 124.170.93.223:34568 [uTP]: [µTorrent 2.0 (100.0)]: -UT2000-8H%d3%3f%c6bA%e5%a4%b8%d2%25 (3.75 MB downloaded, 64.0 kB bad)[2010-05-20 02:16:21] Banned 92.0.37.169:42615 [uTP]: [µTorrent 2.0.1 (100.0)]: -UT2010-0K%a0g%2f%0c%9d%f3%c2%ab%d1%bd (10.6 MB downloaded, 96.0 kB bad)[2010-05-20 02:16:28] Banned 212.24.173.242:50855: -UT2000-xGNK%91%dcT%d8%adR%a1%20 (240 kB downloaded, 64.0 kB bad)[2010-05-20 02:17:21] Banned 82.18.98.61:1887: [µTorrent 2.0.2 (100.0)]: -UT2020-%c0L%3e%bb%f2v%5d%f3%f7%aa%ef%c9 (416 kB downloaded, 64.0 kB bad)[2010-05-20 02:22:53] Banned 86.160.170.157:23642 [uTP]: [µTorrent 2.0 (100.0)]: -UT2000-8H%a1%11%b1%d2%c2%0f%07%12%e3%88 (336 kB downloaded, 64.0 kB bad)[2010-05-20 02:23:27] Banned 94.6.51.145:33097 [uTP]: [µTorrent 2.0 (100.0)]: -UT2000-8H%c6%e5%92%97g%25%b8SJ%12 (80.0 kB downloaded, 64.0 kB bad)[2010-05-20 02:31:21] Banned 94.21.116.3:54312 [uTP]: [µTorrent 2.0.2 (10.3)]: -UT2020-%c0L%11%28V%17%baE%ad%3d%07%de (688 kB downloaded, 64.0 kB bad)Does this indicate some sort of spoofing or something? I didn't think anyone else had implemented µTP yet? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mss73 0 Report post Posted May 24, 2010 -- 2010-05-13: Version 2.0.2 (build 19648)- Change: disable net.calc_overhead by default to improve speeds for users with low capsif someone have channel 100 kb up and set 100kb up in uTorrent.real speed will be 100 minus overheadPlus! His browser (and other programs) will work very slow.What improvement is there?How this setting may improve speed on low channel? Fail. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DreadWingKnight 310 Report post Posted May 24, 2010 Idiot users were using 1kbyte/sec upload caps when their lines are capable of 100. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Firon 3 Report post Posted May 24, 2010 You can still turn it on yourself though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KSUdvm2b 0 Report post Posted May 25, 2010 Something minor I just noticed with 2.0.2:http://tinyurl.com/2abdu42 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ovejero 0 Report post Posted May 29, 2010 Hi guys!Has anyone noticed hash checking problems or is it something in my end? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
moogly 0 Report post Posted May 29, 2010 Which hash checking problems? What's the error you see? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rafi 185 Report post Posted May 29, 2010 Given the info he gave us - it's surely something in his end Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
heidelberg23 0 Report post Posted May 31, 2010 You intend to fix this mess in the statusbar? This mess to manifest only at the local peers connections.http://s55.radikal.ru/i149/1005/fd/e29931c8c00d.jpg Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DreadWingKnight 310 Report post Posted May 31, 2010 Check with the russian translator. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
schnurlos 58 Report post Posted June 1, 2010 @DWK, seems not to be a translation problem. If you select to see all info (D,L,O,T - U,L,O,T) as heidelberg23 does it, the place between the T (total download) and the U (upload) is cut. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
heidelberg23 0 Report post Posted June 2, 2010 schnurlos, you are right - just a cutting problem. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rlewis60 0 Report post Posted June 3, 2010 does this apply to a mac? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites