Jump to content

INTERESTED flag being incorrectly cleared when...


Zoz

Recommended Posts

Greets,

Sorry, but this is a topic being somewhat discussed in another forum, but not apparently understood, confirmed, or otherwise getting any attention:

http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?pid=157366#p157366

uTorrent is dropping its INTERESTED flag after every piece superseeded to it by Azureus clients. About one minute later, uTorrent turns the flag back on and Azureus sends the next piece. Rinse & repeat adinfinitum.

This results in a tremendously inefficient use of time and planned bandwidth allocation for uTorrent users.

Thanks for taking a peek at this...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did some more research and found that uTorrent seems to be waiting an awful long time sending the BT_HAVE piece message:

This is an Azureus log to a uTorrent client:

[10:32:02.666] {net} Received [bT_REQUEST piece #986:2080768->2097151] message;

[10:32:03.525] {net} Sent [bT_PIECE data for piece #986:2031616->2047999] message;

[10:32:04.541] {net} Sent [bT_PIECE data for piece #986:2048000->2064383] message;

[10:32:06.213] {net} Sent [bT_PIECE data for piece #986:2064384->2080767] message;

[10:32:07.431] {net} Sent [bT_PIECE data for piece #986:2080768->2097151] message;

[10:32:09.900] {net} Received [bT_UNINTERESTED] message;

[10:32:17.010] {net} Sent [bT_CHOKE] message;

[10:32:54.135] {net} Received [bT_HAVE piece #986] message;

[10:32:57.635] {net} Sent [bT_HAVE piece #993] message;

[10:32:58.978] {net} Received [bT_INTERESTED] message;

[10:32:59.994] {net} Sent [bT_UNCHOKE] message;

[10:33:00.244] {net} Received [bT_REQUEST piece #993:0->16383] message;

That's over 45 seconds! Other clients send the BT_HAVE within 1 second. This example file is 4GB. Is the piece and file so large that uTorrent handles the save poorly and takes 45 seconds to save it?? I haven't experimented with a smaller file and uTorrent.

Based on this, I s'pose the thread topic should be "Why does uTorrent take 45 secs to ack a received piece from a super-seeding Azureus client?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...