bozotheclown Posted October 16, 2005 Report Share Posted October 16, 2005 Hi there,I've been a very happy bitcomet user for some time and then utorrent came. utorrent uses a lot less memory and a bit less cpu so I'm a happy camper with utorrent. There is one downside and I think I know why bitcomet uses 65mb on my system vs utorrent 3-5mb.Bitcomet does caching of files it downloads. This results in a lot less diskactivity in bitcomet then in utorrent. Does this sound as a reasonable explanation? If so.... is it possible to add a caching feature to utorrent without making the memory footprint huge? I'd like there to be less diskactivity.As stated I am happy with utorrent, it just could be even better then it is allready:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.