Jump to content

µTorrent 3.4 RC


AdamK

Recommended Posts

There seems to be no way to get rid of the "featured torrent" bar despite repeatedly clicking the X on it.

To turn off all ad related and featured content:

Options>preferences>Advanced...

Turn all these settings to false:

left_rail_offer

gui.show_plus_upsell

sponsored_torrent_offer_enabled

bt.enable_pulse

gui.show_notorrents_node

offers.content_offer_autoexec

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've updated to last beta, and the number of torrents are of each label (the number in brackets aside the labels) always appear 1, but I've several torrents in each label. Why always apeear 1 althoug add or delete torrents?. :(

http://img268.imageshack.us/img268/9503/ysku.png

P.S.: As screen capture is too big, do not embedded this in the message, put the link directly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

*Still useless with no UTP connections when seeding!

http://www.imagebam.com/image/372310281870334

http://www.imagebam.com/image/7aec85281870332

What makes you say that? Screenshot? Did you make sure uTP is enabled? Tried resetting your bt.transp_disposition? things get corrupted after years of abuse, you know...

number of torrents are of each label (the number in brackets aside the labels) always appear 1

Confirmed!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What makes you say that?

No UTP data transfers when seeding only (download complete) since build 29336 on numerous tested torrents.

All other releases (3.2.1, 3.3.1, 3.3.2 up to 3.4 build 29336) and before the "Bound listening socket" entries in the log work as it should as far as Utp is concerned.

Utp is enabled in settings and yes tried resetting bt.transp_disposition by starting with a fresh settings.dat many times.

Here are examples of seeding with 2 different torrent files.

vz0acK8.jpg

FvB9B2f.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got to laugh!

Laugh away... Sadly, you don't get it. Yours is an insignificant edge case, rarely noticeable. Thus - low priority. This here is a broken feature. any *regular* label from 3.3.2 is simply *not being counted" at all. This is a major issue, high proprity. Did you get it this time?... :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you don't consider that the two are SYMPTOMS of possibly the same coding error?

The visible effects of any erroneous condition are symptoms NOT the cause!!!

Do you now get why I report what YOU think is insignificant? ANYTHING that shouldn't happen is indicative of a deeper underlying problem, whether it be in human beings or software. To draw an anology, having a 'mole' appear on your arm might be insignificant, but on the other hand it might just be an early indicator of a melanoma.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the same coding error?

Who cares. Report whatever you want. Sadly, as it is, only more significant issues has a chance to be fixed...

At this point, I'd guess that the completely revised Labels engine in 3.4 has something to do with the broken feature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...