Jump to content

µTorrent 3.4 RC

AdamK

By AdamK
in Announcements

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

BMW-X7
BMW-X7

nice thankyou sir i am going to test this version :P

DeathStalker
DeathStalker

Well, I can't say it did that for me - it appeared to check files just fine (I had to re-add a few as the torrents were not in the same place as previously). Oh! Speaking of that! It would be a NICE

Zarggg Advanced Member

Zarggg

Posted
Posted
I tried going back to v2.2.1 (just copying over the resume.dat file), and now everything that I had added in the newer version has to go through a hash check.

That's a royal pain. Anyone know why this would be?

My guess is that the resume.dat file was not compatible with an older version.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AdamK Advanced Member

AdamK

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Shows ~20% lower download speed here (in MB/s...)

Are you measuring the data transfer rate, including the protocol overhead?

Which tools did you use to measure the data rates?

Do you feel that uTorrent is being clear about which it is reporting?

Thanks for the report.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AdamK Advanced Member

AdamK

Posted
  • Author
Posted
@Beasly - LOVE IT!!!! LMFAO!!!

-------------

I got 30305 one out of 5 times (on the 3rd DL).

It'd be laughable if we didn't have to put up with it.

Yes, that is intentional. We now have a system in place that delivers different builds in different proportions (in this case 20%), so that we can test changes independently. This is going to help us get fixes to you much faster, once 3.4 comes out.

In this particular case, 30305 is the fix-display-values track. We are doing work in that branch to fix a long-existing problem in the way that uTorrent draws the torrent information in the torrents ListView.

By the way, if you can think of a good way to communicate that to the user base, please let us know.

(e.g. Maybe a list of the ancillary builds in a smaller font underneath the download button)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rafi Advanced Member

rafi

Posted
Posted
Shows ~20% lower download speed here (in MB/s...)

Are you measuring the data transfer rate' date=' including the protocol overhead?

Which tools did you use to measure the data rates?

Do you feel that uTorrent is being clear about which it is reporting?

Thanks for the report.[/quote']

1. Of cause

2. Bitmeter

3. As long as uT is being delayed/averaged - no. Time to stop this no-sense averaging. The display on the graph is clear about overhead, not so on the main view.

You are welcome.

5ef473287102161.jpg

By the way, if you can think of a good way to communicate that to the user base, please let us know.

Yes, start with not hiding your changelogs explaining the above and with as many details as possible from the public/beta-testers, and for every build please, no exceptions.... :P

I'm sure you don't need anyone here to tell you this... :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Beasly Advanced Member

Beasly

Posted
Posted
We now have a system in place that delivers different builds in different proportions (in this case 20%), so that we can test changes independently.

If what you say is true then why are there still previous builds available for us to download?

build 30267

build 30263

build 30269

build 30271

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jamiemelati Advanced Member

jamiemelati

Posted
Posted

If what you say is true then why are there still previous builds available for us to download?

For What its worth here is my download history for the last several weeks

Note: That the last three releases are all the same size

Date Time Size Atttempted Actually

to Download Downloaded

13-10-26 15:07:36 1,274,192 .a.. utorrent(32)_3.4.0-30267-Beta.exe

13-10-26 17:35:51 1,065,296 .a.. utorrent(32)_3.4.0-30267-Beta-aa(30269-Beta).exe

13-10-30 18:20:55 1,278,544 .a.. utorrent(32)_3.4.0-30267-Beta-ad(30262-Beta).exe

13-10-30 18:26:15 1,274,704 .a.. utorrent(32)_3.4.0-30267-Beta-ae(30271-Beta).exe

13-10-30 18:28:41 1,274,192 .a.. utorrent(32)_3.4.0-30267-Beta-af(30267-Beta).exe

13-10-31 8:11:46 1,274,704 .a.. utorrent(32)_3.4.0-30267-Beta-ag(30287-Beta).exe

13-10-31 21:26:28 1,274,192 .a.. utorrent(32)_3.4.0-30272-Beta.exe

13-10-31 21:29:46 1,274,704 .a.. utorrent(32)_3.4.0-30272-Beta-aa(30287-Beta).exe

13-10-31 21:35:07 1,278,544 .a.. utorrent(32)_3.4.0-30272-Beta-ab(30262-Beta).exe

13-10-31 21:42:43 1,065,296 .a.. utorrent(32)_3.4.0-30272-Beta-ac(30269-Beta).exe

13-11-03 10:46:47 1,065,296 .a.. utorrent(32)_3.4.0-30272-Beta-ba(30269-Beta).exe

13-11-03 10:48:43 1,274,704 .a.. utorrent(32)_3.4.0-30272-Beta-bb(30287-Beta).exe

13-11-03 10:50:23 1,278,544 .a.. utorrent(32)_3.4.0-30272-Beta-bc(30262-Beta).exe

13-11-03 10:52:27 1,274,192 .a.. utorrent(32)_3.4.0-30272-Beta-bd(30272-Beta).exe

13-11-07 9:06:21 1,274,192 .a.. utorrent(32)_3.4.0-30304-Beta.exe

13-11-07 9:07:22 1,273,680 .a.. utorrent(32)_3.4.0-30304-Beta-aa(30296-Beta).exe

13-11-07 9:12:15 1,274,704 .a.. utorrent(32)_3.4.0-30304-Beta-ab(30305-Beta).exe

13-11-07 9:19:07 1,278,544 .a.. utorrent(32)_3.4.0-30304-Beta-ac(30262-Beta).exe

13-11-07 9:20:46 1,066,832 .a.. utorrent(32)_3.4.0-30304-Beta-ad(30300-Beta).exe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...