Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

AdamK

µTorrent 3.4 RC

Recommended Posts

I tried going back to v2.2.1 (just copying over the resume.dat file), and now everything that I had added in the newer version has to go through a hash check.

That's a royal pain. Anyone know why this would be?

My guess is that the resume.dat file was not compatible with an older version.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

uTorrent 3.4 Beta build 30300

and

uTorrent 3.4 Beta build 30305 are now available for your Bittorrent Inc.'s roulette game of chance.

Round and Round we Go....Where it stops No-one knows!

zNppijL.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
uTorrent 3.4 Beta 30304

3.4.0.30305 is available.

where? can you give a direct link to download it? because i only get 30304 when i try to download

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Shows ~20% lower download speed here (in MB/s...)

Are you measuring the data transfer rate, including the protocol overhead?

Which tools did you use to measure the data rates?

Do you feel that uTorrent is being clear about which it is reporting?

Thanks for the report.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Will the problem connecting to UTP when seeding be fixed while in beta or are you waiting for it to become a stable release!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
@Beasly - LOVE IT!!!! LMFAO!!!

-------------

I got 30305 one out of 5 times (on the 3rd DL).

It'd be laughable if we didn't have to put up with it.

Yes, that is intentional. We now have a system in place that delivers different builds in different proportions (in this case 20%), so that we can test changes independently. This is going to help us get fixes to you much faster, once 3.4 comes out.

In this particular case, 30305 is the fix-display-values track. We are doing work in that branch to fix a long-existing problem in the way that uTorrent draws the torrent information in the torrents ListView.

By the way, if you can think of a good way to communicate that to the user base, please let us know.

(e.g. Maybe a list of the ancillary builds in a smaller font underneath the download button)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Shows ~20% lower download speed here (in MB/s...)

Are you measuring the data transfer rate' date=' including the protocol overhead?

Which tools did you use to measure the data rates?

Do you feel that uTorrent is being clear about which it is reporting?

Thanks for the report.[/quote']

1. Of cause

2. Bitmeter

3. As long as uT is being delayed/averaged - no. Time to stop this no-sense averaging. The display on the graph is clear about overhead, not so on the main view.

You are welcome.

5ef473287102161.jpg

By the way, if you can think of a good way to communicate that to the user base, please let us know.

Yes, start with not hiding your changelogs explaining the above and with as many details as possible from the public/beta-testers, and for every build please, no exceptions.... :P

I'm sure you don't need anyone here to tell you this... :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
We now have a system in place that delivers different builds in different proportions (in this case 20%), so that we can test changes independently.

If what you say is true then why are there still previous builds available for us to download?

build 30267

build 30263

build 30269

build 30271

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If what you say is true then why are there still previous builds available for us to download?

For What its worth here is my download history for the last several weeks

Note: That the last three releases are all the same size

Date Time Size Atttempted Actually

to Download Downloaded

13-10-26 15:07:36 1,274,192 .a.. utorrent(32)_3.4.0-30267-Beta.exe

13-10-26 17:35:51 1,065,296 .a.. utorrent(32)_3.4.0-30267-Beta-aa(30269-Beta).exe

13-10-30 18:20:55 1,278,544 .a.. utorrent(32)_3.4.0-30267-Beta-ad(30262-Beta).exe

13-10-30 18:26:15 1,274,704 .a.. utorrent(32)_3.4.0-30267-Beta-ae(30271-Beta).exe

13-10-30 18:28:41 1,274,192 .a.. utorrent(32)_3.4.0-30267-Beta-af(30267-Beta).exe

13-10-31 8:11:46 1,274,704 .a.. utorrent(32)_3.4.0-30267-Beta-ag(30287-Beta).exe

13-10-31 21:26:28 1,274,192 .a.. utorrent(32)_3.4.0-30272-Beta.exe

13-10-31 21:29:46 1,274,704 .a.. utorrent(32)_3.4.0-30272-Beta-aa(30287-Beta).exe

13-10-31 21:35:07 1,278,544 .a.. utorrent(32)_3.4.0-30272-Beta-ab(30262-Beta).exe

13-10-31 21:42:43 1,065,296 .a.. utorrent(32)_3.4.0-30272-Beta-ac(30269-Beta).exe

13-11-03 10:46:47 1,065,296 .a.. utorrent(32)_3.4.0-30272-Beta-ba(30269-Beta).exe

13-11-03 10:48:43 1,274,704 .a.. utorrent(32)_3.4.0-30272-Beta-bb(30287-Beta).exe

13-11-03 10:50:23 1,278,544 .a.. utorrent(32)_3.4.0-30272-Beta-bc(30262-Beta).exe

13-11-03 10:52:27 1,274,192 .a.. utorrent(32)_3.4.0-30272-Beta-bd(30272-Beta).exe

13-11-07 9:06:21 1,274,192 .a.. utorrent(32)_3.4.0-30304-Beta.exe

13-11-07 9:07:22 1,273,680 .a.. utorrent(32)_3.4.0-30304-Beta-aa(30296-Beta).exe

13-11-07 9:12:15 1,274,704 .a.. utorrent(32)_3.4.0-30304-Beta-ab(30305-Beta).exe

13-11-07 9:19:07 1,278,544 .a.. utorrent(32)_3.4.0-30304-Beta-ac(30262-Beta).exe

13-11-07 9:20:46 1,066,832 .a.. utorrent(32)_3.4.0-30304-Beta-ad(30300-Beta).exe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

New offer at BitTorrent -- Fix one get at least one free

I would suggest that your CVS may need some looking at!

"No labels" category caption job count FUBARed between 3.4.0.272 -> 3.4.0.30304

Bug Report

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
uTorrent 3.4 Beta 30304

3.4.0.30305 is available.

where? can you give a direct link to download it? because i only get 30304 when i try to download

it is not 0.0.0.00001 that will fix the stuff you need :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(Just not going to read 28 pages to see if anyone's already posted about it)

Labels incorrectly display the number of entries under each label.

Inactive, Downloading, Torrents and Active work, but custom labels (Except No Labels) all show (1), even though they contain more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.