Vitos_Ru Posted November 10, 2013 Report Share Posted November 10, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DreadWingKnight Posted November 11, 2013 Report Share Posted November 11, 2013 Oh hey.*byte/sec vs *bit/sec Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zevel Posted November 11, 2013 Report Share Posted November 11, 2013 3.4.28462 Installer sets executable path to %appdata%/utorrent instead of %programfiles%/utorrentInstaller does not offer option to change default installation location.Yes' date=' that's the whole reason for 3.4. Can't be installed in Program Files to do autoupdates without UAC.[/quote']There's no UAC in XP.Is there a way to override this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted November 11, 2013 Report Share Posted November 11, 2013 Is there a way to override this?Manually replace the exe wherever you want... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zdnko Posted November 11, 2013 Report Share Posted November 11, 2013 Build 30305:On torrent list the second column sort doesn't work Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeathStalker Posted November 11, 2013 Report Share Posted November 11, 2013 3.4.0 build 30309 and 3.4.0 build 30314 are now available for download...No changelogs for either build.A very seldom bunndle download is also available...(uTorrent-3.4-beta-feature-dev-pane-html-30309-bunndle.exe)...http://bundles.bittorrent.com/current/index.htmlIt took an ANNOYING *6* tries to get 30314.WHY is it so much trouble just to simply post a direct link to each build?Yeah, maybe a changelog immediately is asking a lot, but I *seriously* don;t think that asking for a direct link to each build is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firon Posted November 11, 2013 Report Share Posted November 11, 2013 They're test builds. You aren't supposed to get a direct link to them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeathStalker Posted November 11, 2013 Report Share Posted November 11, 2013 30314 *still* has the missing Status Icons - they've been gone since Build 30287.-------------------Also, seems to show speed that doesn't exist. No DLs going, but showing 30+kB/s down (that WAY more than just overhead) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike20021969 Posted November 11, 2013 Report Share Posted November 11, 2013 It took an ANNOYING *6* tries to get 30314.I just downloaded 3.4.0.30317 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamiemelati Posted November 11, 2013 Report Share Posted November 11, 2013 They're test builds. You aren't supposed to get a direct link to them.Well we have been getting indirect links to lots of them for months and it has been reported many times.Read the many posts, emails etc.If we are not supposed to get a link to then remove the links. They cause a lot of confusion and sometimes damage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeathStalker Posted November 12, 2013 Report Share Posted November 12, 2013 It took an ANNOYING *6* tries to get 30314.I just downloaded 3.4.0.30317 Does it (finally) show the Status Icons???!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vitos_Ru Posted November 12, 2013 Report Share Posted November 12, 2013 Oh hey.*byte/sec vs *bit/secNo, kB vs kB------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DreadWingKnight Posted November 12, 2013 Report Share Posted November 12, 2013 There's stuff you're not showing that is relevant to troubleshooting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vitos_Ru Posted November 12, 2013 Report Share Posted November 12, 2013 incorrect speed shows Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeathStalker Posted November 12, 2013 Report Share Posted November 12, 2013 Strange that the last notification email I got had a Russian (looking) Sender Name - normally it reads "uTorrent Community Forums Mailer" - this one read Отправитель - same address though, forum-no-reply@utorrent.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted November 12, 2013 Report Share Posted November 12, 2013 Strange that the last notification email I got had a Russian (looking) Sender NameNo worries, just a bug at the NSA/FBI... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeathStalker Posted November 12, 2013 Report Share Posted November 12, 2013 Strange that the last notification email I got had a Russian (looking) Sender NameNo worries' date=' just a bug at the NSA/FBI... [/quote']Yeah, kinda figured it was something like that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zdnko Posted November 12, 2013 Report Share Posted November 12, 2013 Build 30305:On torrent list the second column sort doesn't workDowngraded to 30300 and it works fine!EDIT: Downgraded to 30300 and second column sort works fine but network ko!Build 30304 seems ok: network & second column sort, maybe doesn't work something else! :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grey_rat Posted November 12, 2013 Report Share Posted November 12, 2013 http://www.bittorrent.org/beps/bep_0039.htmlciaobaby, please, show a working example Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andreasvb Posted November 12, 2013 Report Share Posted November 12, 2013 http://www.bittorrent.org/beps/bep_0039.htmlciaobaby, please, show a working exampleThis is an example how it works: http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?pid=743822#p743822 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeathStalker Posted November 13, 2013 Report Share Posted November 13, 2013 So 30317 STILL doesn't have the Status Icons .... come on people, how hard can this *really* be to fix?----------------And the STOP button is back to being the PAUSE icon.(maybe) one step forward, but two steps backwards ......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ciaobaby Posted November 13, 2013 Report Share Posted November 13, 2013 As mentioned earlier in the thread, they are TEST BUILDS, and as such YOU should not be using them!!The ONLY builds that should be run OUTSIDE of the developer team are the ones that appear on the PUBLIC end of the CDN, if it ISN'T on there you should NOT be using it or complaining about it.Stop downloading builds from 'leaked' URIs and you won't see so many variations in builds numbers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeathStalker Posted November 13, 2013 Report Share Posted November 13, 2013 If that's what you're going to claim, then as an IT/Process/Project Management Professional, I'm going to say that you have a *significantly* screwed up system. Simple as that. Lackadaisical in implementation.You don't WANT people to DL then, then it's real simple - DON'T MAKE THEM AVAILABLE.Sloppiness on *your* part will not resolve questions on OUR part.There may be Betas, but honestly, it's been quite a while since we saw anything run "professionally" here - it's more like Mom & Pop, fly-by-the-seat-of-your-pants development & deployment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ciaobaby Posted November 13, 2013 Report Share Posted November 13, 2013 If that's what you're going to claim,I'm not trying to claim anything, merely reiterating what was/has been pointed out earlier in the thread.They're test builds. You aren't supposed to get a direct link to them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeathStalker Posted November 13, 2013 Report Share Posted November 13, 2013 Ok, maybe that *shouldn't* have been directed at you, but at the Dev/Admin/PM teams.Please accept my apologies for the indiscretion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.