Jump to content

µTorrent 3.2.2 / 3.2.3 Stable


bigfalls

Recommended Posts

If we have the same build number we have the same executable.

Not necessarily...It sometimes depends on where you downloaded it!

@osmosis: Can you upload your build to somewhere?

So, have you uploaded the build to somewhere yet?... :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 202
  • Created
  • Last Reply

No, because BitTorrent Inc. doesn't build with the same buildnumber in a branch without it having the same code. Removing the "create subfolder" option would change the svn#=build#.

I don't download from "some other site", I get them from utorrent.com, so our executables are the same. It must be a settings difference, and I'm not uploading my settings file.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, because BitTorrent Inc. doesn't build with the same buildnumber in a branch without it having the same code. Removing the "create subfolder" option would change the svn#=build#.

I don't download from "some other site", I get them from utorrent.com, so our executables are the same. It must be a settings difference, and I'm not uploading my settings file.

http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?pid=695540#p695540

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New version (3.2.2b28595) out - my only question...

http://s13.postimage.org/f1o47mmwn/Create_Subfolder_gone.png

That "Create Subfolder" checkbox was one of the best new functions. :( Now theres no way to download torrent without any unwanted subdirs...

May i ask you guys what was the point of removing it? Will it ever be back' date=' or are you planning to introduce a new feature instead this checkbox?[/quote']

It wasn't ready, and was never intended to be in 3.2.2. You can find it in 3.3 and 3.4, though.

Not creating subfolders wasn't ready? :o Are you kidding? uTorrent wasn't creating these stupid subfolders for YEARS! This "feature" was invented only recently. :mad:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know this might be something small but is there any way to get the folder search when you're choosing a torrent download location to show all the files in the folder in the new 3.2.3 build? I download quite a few torrents every week and showing all the files in the folder help me keep track of which episodes, in my case, I need to download. In the previous build, it showed all the contents like a typical file location search but now I just get folders with "No items match your search"

Like I said, it's not something I won't be able to deal with but it sure as hell is more convenient than having to open the folder separately to make sure I haven't skipped an episode.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good job utorrent. You released a terrible update.

It basically doesn't work. I've checked with a friend who also uses utorrent, and we both can't download or seed. BitTorrent is working fine though. If you guys don't solve this issue soon.. Well basically I'll boycott I guess?

And you guy's released two updates in basically two consecutive days, so you should be able to get one out that fixes this problem (not to mention the update from yesterday or the day before worked fine)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So.........

Because you never bother to do some serious testing... Like actually try multiple seeding jobs with your perfect download, change-lower upload limit, try limit overhead , see what happens and so on. Just your single-lame use-case will get you no true evaluation.

That is why - you are not "qualified" be taken seriously (testing related) . That is why "so......... "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The newer version stopped working on my computer too. Before the upgrade, no issue. Since : "It's dead Jim."

I have Windows 7 with the latest patches from Microsoft (every Tuesday night).

The details of my Internet connection are (sorry if it is in French) :

Suffixe DNS propre à la connexion: Description: Realtek RTL8168B/8111B Family PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet NIC (NDIS 6.20)Adresse physique: 00-19-DB-68-64-2DDHCP activé: OuiAdresse IPv4: 192.168.10.101Masque de sous-réseau IPv4: 255.255.255.0Bail obtenu: 11 décembre 2012 01:38:48Bail expirant: 18 décembre 2012 19:45:51Passerelle par défaut IPv4: 192.168.10.1Serveur DHCP IPv4: 192.168.10.1Serveur DNS IPv4: 192.168.10.1Serveur WINS IPv4: NetBIOS sur TCP/IP activé: OuiAdresse IPv6 locale de lien: fe80::99f7:698c:774b:e2a6%11Passerelle par défaut IPv6: Serveur DNS IPv6:

When it was working, uTorrent was downloading at around 460Kb/s and uploading was up to around 60Kb/s. Since the update, it is 0,2Kb/s and 0,1Kb/s. I have the impression that uTorrent is able to send & read the header part of the packets, but cannot send & read the data part. Or something like that. Whatever, I am not a network specialist and you're the ones who have to figure out what you broke.

Anyway...

I don't see "Clients" or "Clients" cannot see me, not sure which is which. The fact is : there is no connection with the "clients". Even the green circle stating that the Internet connection works is not display at all.

===

Right before I upgraded, my uTorrent was downloading 1 file. It have been frozen at 61.9% since.

I was also uploading 7 files at the time. So not an overload issue.

===

And before you ask : I rebooted my computer, my cable modem and my router. No change. I can connect with the world with all my other softwares (games and utilities), but not uTorrent. Clearly, this is an uTorrent fault, not the hardware, not the user, but the software.

===

Question 1 : Where can I find the previous version of uTorrent on your website, the one that works? If you do not have one, why do you not offer an option or a solution to correct your mistake? It seems to me it would be the simplest form of respect to your users and a perfect way to say "Sorry to have release an unstable version and here the *real* stable version."

Question 2 : I found uTorrent 2.2 on the web. It probably do not have all the latest hooplas of 3.2, like the labels and the automatic move to a subdirectory, but will it works flawlesly? Will it recognizes the 5500 torrents I have in my uTorrent 3.2 libraries?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every computer has different specs and not all have high speed internet, etc, etc....

You also cannot compare apples with oranges!!!

I am fully aware of that fact and as my computer is NOT up at the latest spec I would anticipate that many processes that affect the piece retrieval/request rate would be somewhat slower, this has not been the case though.

There are other problems which should have negated 3.2.3 from becoming a "stable" release as it goes 'unresponsive' or crashes completely far more than a 'stable' version should do. In the past two days three "crash dumps" have been 'Sent to developers' automatically, which however have not affected download or upload. So because of that I have rolled my system back to 3.2.2.28595 to see if it is uTorrent that is causing the problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So.........

Because you never bother to do some serious testing... Like actually try multiple seeding jobs with your perfect download' date=' change-lower upload limit, try limit overhead , see what happens and so on. Just your single-lame use-case will get you no true evaluation.

That is why - you are not "qualified" be taken seriously (testing related) . That is why [b']"so......... "

So do you have some 'back door' into someone's system that you assume is mine where you can see only one job running at anyone time. Because if you don't you are thoroughly way off the mark why how I run , test and evaluate BitTorrent clients.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

do you have some 'back door' into someone's system

I (we) know of the devs are currently working on known limiter issues (that I've mentioned, and they've tried to release in the latest-of-the-table 3.3). The fact that your system doesn't manifest them, only means that you (or your system) do not provide the "proper" test conditions/environment for that. Simple... no need to hack into your system... It is not that interesting... :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that your system doesn't manifest them

Then it isn't a "bug" in the software. If it was a true bug it would manifest itself on ANY hardware given the same conditions for the application.

You simply don't get it (what test conditions/environment means), so let's just leave it be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Cab0oze: I guess the dialog is going to take less space in the future, maybe even according to the number of items in the file listbox - the truth is that it has some hidden controls atm, so the most possible scenario is that the minimal height of the window is set to the current one (~539px) because of these controls.

sshot_1.png

Some months ago i've created a draft & a sample application for plans of a new dialog (click here for the post), i don't know if the devs are going to place a similar separator / splitter at the center of the form just like i did - this way the whole dialog would be fully customizable, according to the users needs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that your system doesn't manifest them

Then it isn't a "bug" in the software. If it was a true bug it would manifest itself on ANY hardware given the same conditions for the application.

You simply don't get it (what test conditions/environment menas)' date=' so let's just leave it be.[/quote']

Actually I am well aware of test conditions and environments are having been a software developer for a little under twenty tears.

and if a "bug" requires a specific environment or platform to manifest in, it is a environment issue NOT an application one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that your system doesn't manifest them

Then it isn't a "bug" in the software. If it was a true bug it would manifest itself on ANY hardware given the same conditions for the application.

You simply don't get it (what test conditions/environment menas)' date=' so let's just leave it be.[/quote']

Actually I am well aware of test conditions and environments are having been a software developer for a little under twenty tears.

and if a "bug" requires a specific environment or platform to manifest in, it is a environment issue NOT an application one.

Than I hope I won't have to use any software you develop... :D

Unless you're creating a software which will run only on one device in one place, there will be bugs about handling some special environments / cases... (At least that's what I've seen during the ~5 years working as a software developer)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there will be bugs about handling some special environments / cases...
Of course there will, there is not a developer in the world that can envisage and account for every possible combination, but that does not mean that a "bug" exists. A bug is an unexpected behaviour for a given set of circumstances and developing for a Windows environment is not the minefield that it used to be.
Than I hope I won't have to use any software you develop...
well there are companies that do or have done and means that I don't have to work five or days a week.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...