dunno99 Posted May 2, 2006 Report Posted May 2, 2006 I'm not sure where this goes, so I'll just post it here and hope the people that this matters to will catch this.As we all know, a lot of internet service providers contract their traffic shaping solutions. So I ended up talking to this guy who said he worked at some internet traffic shaping company. He said that not a lot of solutions filter out bittorrent encryption, but they managed to find a way to avoid the encryption altogether. Their solution relies on the fact that the tracker traffic isn't encrypted (or something to that effect), and then using that info to filter out/limit those traffic. So maybe the next step is to make that part encrypted too?Just a heads up. (I suppose some people might be aware of this problem already...but just in case)
Firon Posted May 2, 2006 Report Posted May 2, 2006 yeah, it's nothing special (there's many ways around encryption, most are just not feasible), and something that SSL would probably solve.
Zatla Posted May 2, 2006 Report Posted May 2, 2006 there are ways to encrypt the the tracker communications already... you can use Tor for that.You can get tor from: http://tor.eff.orgAnd here is the setting for it: http://wiki.noreply.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/TorifyHOWTO#BitTorrent
Firon Posted May 2, 2006 Report Posted May 2, 2006 Doesn't work that well since you can't get incoming connections.
Zatla Posted May 2, 2006 Report Posted May 2, 2006 hmm.. i tested and i got a connection with the tracker, first it said something about 'invalid transfercoding', then i got 'functional' and i got conneted with peers, i didn't had dht on... only if you get the response from the tracker wth the information about the peers it should work... right?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.