christopherreay Posted June 12, 2014 Report Posted June 12, 2014 Ive been reading through the posts on upload quing and scheduling and such, and I think there is an idea that has not been mentioned. People have "Intent" when seeding a torrent. For example, I have two basic categories (or three perhaps) of torrents that I seed "Im watching this", Short Term, Huge swarm torrents, expected to be in vogue for a couple of weeks. These I seed to 200% and then delete from my drive "I believe in this", relatively large swarm, long term seeding These may have unlimited seeding, and I want them to have some bandwidth when people are asking for them, but not all the badwidth I might get bored of it in a few months or a year or something "This is important to me", SMALL swarm, long term seeding I want these to have ALL the bandwidth that is requested of them (say up to 80% of my up bandwidth)The thing is, I think that the scheduling algorithms are really based around the idea that "a torrent might have only 10 users all on dialup.Torrenting is MUCH more succcessful that that as a paradigm and a medium.I dont think that it is possible for a mechanism to "automatically" assign bandwidth accurately. For example, torrents is category 1 should be prioritised OLDEST first, so that I can delete them off my hard drive as early as possible. At the moment, uTorrent just keeps starting again, so I end up with Gb and Gb of 100% or 120% or so ratio torrents, instead of calmly plodding through them all oldest first. If a leecher arrives that wants one of my category 3 torrents, I want him to take as much of my bandwidth as he can handle, forget 1 and 2. I really think that algorithms based on a set of 3 or 5 "Intent Categories" could be much more accurate, more intuitive and allow for the genuinely large scope of what "is on the torrent network"
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.