Drawsden Posted June 1, 2006 Report Posted June 1, 2006 I am curious if anyone else is noticing a difference with private/public tracker speeds.All was great until a month ago and private tracker won't go above 15K yet public will max out(70K)Plenty of peers, tried changing everything I could think of.Is it possible Cogeco is capping the private ips themselves rather than the p2p client?Downloads are fine, green light, encryption enabled.XP Corp sp2(up2date) P4 3.0 1 Gig RAM Linksys RouterThanks in advanceKeep up the great work!!!!
Firon Posted June 1, 2006 Report Posted June 1, 2006 Most private sites have tons of seeds and few peers.
Drawsden Posted June 1, 2006 Author Report Posted June 1, 2006 I appreciate the response but I am 100% sure that is not the issue here. I had always been able to seed to 120% with ease; even had to cap the upload to allow me to browse and stuff. Seems the latest attempt by the provider is only affecting the private trackers. Regards...
Inf Posted June 1, 2006 Report Posted June 1, 2006 And ISP couldn't care less if its a private or a public tracker.
Firon Posted June 1, 2006 Report Posted June 1, 2006 Nor can they tell the difference as far as peers go.
Switeck Posted June 2, 2006 Report Posted June 2, 2006 I've heard Cogeco makes it very hard to seed.With private torrents, there may be few peers at a time and lots of seeds. So you'll be in seeding mode far faster than on public torrents...and if they throttle seeding separate somehow, at a low speed too.
Drawsden Posted June 2, 2006 Author Report Posted June 2, 2006 Thanks for all the replies.What about the files? Private is usually rar'd whereas public is one big file.Not trying to be a pain here, just trying to resolve this. I know the peer ratio is not the issue......atleast in my case......there has to be more to it. I've run exstensive tests using various trackers, both public and private with equal peer ratio, yet always yeild the same end result. Regards.....
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.