OCedHrt Posted February 14, 2008 Report Share Posted February 14, 2008 Is this option still limited to ports 25 and 100 in 1.7.7? Currently I have the option set to 25,53,80,110,465,995.The reason I ask is because I am trying to block connection to certain ports for QoS reasons. I understand that it has previously been discussed that this could be detrimental to the swarm, but it is allowing a select few users to get through my router's QoS.110,465,995 are all listened to by my anti-virus and I am still trying to get this disabled. 25, 53, and 80 are configured with higher priority than typical bulk traffic and this is the main problem as some connections are getting through.Also, why does searching for bt.no_connect_to_services and rough equivalents return no results? There are topics that match this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jewelisheaven Posted February 14, 2008 Report Share Posted February 14, 2008 ... remote ports. Local connections happen on your listening port.bt.no_connect_to_services: This option tells µTorrent not to connect to peers using ports specified in "bt.no_connect_to_services_list" as their listening ports. This stops firewalls from complaining about µTorrent trying to send an e-mail. bt.no_connect_to_services_list: This option specifies which ports µTorrent should not connect to when "bt.no_connect_to_services" is enabled. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firon Posted February 14, 2008 Report Share Posted February 14, 2008 It blocks connecting to those remote ports, but that's all it does. Blocking those ports won't really make QoS work significantly better, at least on a consumer router Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manus Posted April 6, 2010 Report Share Posted April 6, 2010 I'm using the latest stable 2.0 (with DHT enabled) on Win7, and it seems outgoing connections to the specified no_connect ports are still being attempted.I've read the FAQ and various forum threads about related-but-not-quite-identical issues, and this still seems like incorrect behavior. Can anyone else verify this? Am I missing something?Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firon Posted April 6, 2010 Report Share Posted April 6, 2010 The feature is TCP only. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manus Posted April 6, 2010 Report Share Posted April 6, 2010 Ah, that explains it! Can this be clarified in the docs?http://www.bittorrent.com/btusers/guides/bittorrent-user-manual/appendix-bittorrent-mainline-interface/preferences/advanced#bt.no_connect_to_servicesThanks again! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moogly Posted April 6, 2010 Report Share Posted April 6, 2010 @manus:if you want to add something to the user manual you think legitimate, you can post your request in this thread. http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?id=64803 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.