simonbcn Posted September 16, 2010 Report Share Posted September 16, 2010 It would be very necessary you add one field in the webUI, for example in torrent General tab, about the state info of tracker/s.In this moment, we are blind about this.Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcdonald Posted September 16, 2010 Report Share Posted September 16, 2010 add one field in the webUI, for example in torrent General tab, about the state info of tracker/s.Thanks for the post. I added your request to our internal issue tracking system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRaider Posted November 3, 2010 Report Share Posted November 3, 2010 That would be very useful! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simonbcn Posted November 3, 2010 Author Report Share Posted November 3, 2010 Is this implemented already? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultima Posted November 3, 2010 Report Share Posted November 3, 2010 ... If the changelog doesn't mention it, and you don't see it, then I think you already know the answer. So, if you're just asking to bump this thread, then well, mcdonald already said this was added to the issue tracker -- a reminder isn't necessary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simonbcn Posted November 3, 2010 Author Report Share Posted November 3, 2010 If you think that it's normal, after 4 versions, I still can't see if one torrent has an error and what kind of error... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultima Posted November 3, 2010 Report Share Posted November 3, 2010 I never said anything about "normal". This is a feature that I've personally requested forever ago in the backend API as well, but I realize that there are priorities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simonbcn Posted November 3, 2010 Author Report Share Posted November 3, 2010 That feature request is for windows version (they have the GUI to see this errors) but in Linux version I have nothing to see this!! The priorities in both versions are totally different.And, one more thing, that feature request was opened 15 months ago and It's still unsolved!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultima Posted November 3, 2010 Report Share Posted November 3, 2010 I have never once looked at any WebUI deficiency and thought "oh, the Windows UI has this feature already, so it doesn't really matter". Thanks for assuming that I have no grasp of the use-case behind WebUI though. The fact of the matter is that the devs have tons of other things they still need to take care of first (stability being among the top), and you don't seem to get this. Why do you suppose mcdonald goes through the effort of spending days to stress test builds before release?Back to the point on hand: feature parity (where it makes sense) between all the µTorrent ports is always a goal. On top of that, the devs already have this feature specifically filed in their ticket tracker. They'll get to it when they get to it. µTorrent Server is in alpha right now -- and isn't yet considered stable -- for a reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superman710e Posted November 3, 2010 Report Share Posted November 3, 2010 I have never once looked at any WebUI deficiency and thought "oh, the Windows UI has this feature already, so it doesn't really matter". Thanks for assuming that I have no grasp of the use-case behind WebUI though. The fact of the matter is that the devs have tons of other things they still need to take care of first (stability being among the top), and you don't seem to get this. Why do you suppose mcdonald goes through the effort of spending days to stress test builds before release?Back to the point on hand: feature parity (where it makes sense) between all the µTorrent ports is always a goal. On top of that, the devs already have this feature specifically filed in their ticket tracker. They'll get to it when they get to it. µTorrent Server is in alpha right now -- and isn't yet considered stable -- for a reason.Hear, hear! And thanks for all the hard work. I look forward to several features, but I am happy with the multiple features that do work well! And the stability of this "unstable alpha" is actually very high! Keep up the good work team! Thanks again for the Linux server version!Thanks,Jason Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.