osm0sis Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 -diskio.no_zero=true What's the advantage here? Doesn't that mean that it won't preallocate the space required for the file? Isn't the preallocation a good thing for lowering incesant disk writing and file fragmentation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
superbizho Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 HELLO.help me please.. after installing the new version now i can download on full speed1!!! thanks !!!BUT!!! im getting BSODs all the time with TCPIP error... what should i do!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTHK Posted April 1, 2009 Report Share Posted April 1, 2009 osmosis: http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?id=46473superbizho: A BSOD with tcpip.sys indicates bad networking drivers. Update your drivers. If that doesn't work, make a new thread with µT build number, network adapter being used, if it's a wireless, and your ISP. Also make sure you are configured properly, no YouTube settings. Configure using #1, and if you still have issues after configuring with #1 and updating your drivers, try the conservative settings in #2.1: http://www.utorrent.com/setup_guide.php2: http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?id=34259 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
osm0sis Posted April 1, 2009 Report Share Posted April 1, 2009 GTHK: Interesting.. so I guess Greg's reservations were allayed. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firon Posted April 1, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 1, 2009 We'll have a new alpha up soon enough to fix the upload issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted April 1, 2009 Report Share Posted April 1, 2009 Firon:We'll have a new alpha...oh ? this is a major fix, regressing uT from beta to alpha, eh ? ... btw, will this attend to the inaccurate speed limiters' issue too ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firon Posted April 1, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 1, 2009 Eh, it was supposed to be alpha from the start, not beta. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted April 1, 2009 Report Share Posted April 1, 2009 right... it still can be... you just have to change one word in the code... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alex14san Posted April 1, 2009 Report Share Posted April 1, 2009 is it possible to have different bt.transp_disposition options for LAN (10.* 192.168.* 172.x.*) and for Intrenet?On LAN I have full 100mbit UL/DL with TCP and <10mbit with uTP.and on "normal" internet with uTP I have better speed than TCP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firon Posted April 1, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 1, 2009 New alpha up. This fixes uTP upload rates and the upload rate limiter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted April 2, 2009 Report Share Posted April 2, 2009 @ bt.transp_disposition = 15, XP SP2, ADSL 1.6Mbps/160Kbps ,2 DL tasks 1 seeding task, 2 slots per task, calc_overhead = true- download limiter is still broken in here ... - upload speed (measured with external tool) is still above the UL limit (~200 connected peers, calc_overhead=true)- clearing of the main listview on download click in the RSS view - is still happeningBy rafi_dBy rafi_d Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zhong881209 Posted April 2, 2009 Report Share Posted April 2, 2009 advanced there added many new thing, is there any manual or mind to explain ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ichpuchtli Posted April 2, 2009 Report Share Posted April 2, 2009 Thanks for the 14981.Since uTP is now optimized for "full" MTU of 1500, any directions about tweaking Win AFD's FastSendDatagramThreshold value ? Is default 1024 ok or can be optimized for 1500?http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb726981.aspxhttp://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc781532.aspxAnd so, FastCopyReceiveThreshold ?Thanks again. GREAT NEWS, DEP finally! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arvid Posted April 2, 2009 Report Share Posted April 2, 2009 @rafiAny tips on how I can reproduce this? Does it happen when uTP is disabled (bt.transp_disp = 5)?It's been working perfectly for me since this fix, any hints would be appreciated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freddyboy1 Posted April 3, 2009 Report Share Posted April 3, 2009 Same thing as rafi here. Vista SP1. Cannot limit upload. Tryed bt.transp_disp = 5 bt.transp_disp = 15, all the same. Forced limit upload at 15k, and it's at 50k. BUT, if I limit it to 3k, then the actual speed is around 15-20k. Hope this info helps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xyly Posted April 3, 2009 Report Share Posted April 3, 2009 I can't set upload limit in 14981.When bt.transp_disposition=15 and up limit = 10kB, it upload 40+KB all the way ( my conn is 1M ADSL which has 50~KB/s ul ). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted April 3, 2009 Report Share Posted April 3, 2009 arvid:Any tips on how I can reproduce this? Does it happen when uTP is disabled (bt.transp_disp = 5)?It's been working perfectly for me since this fix, any hints would be appreciated.Well, I can see that a few other users have reported the issue, most with ADSL and low UL (maybe this is the case the issue manifests itself more) . What I can suggest for you is to try the same configuration (I'll email you my dat files) and focus on low UL limit (~10-15K). Make sure you measure with some external tool . AS for the test conditions: 2 DL tasks and one seeding task with ~3-4 slots was enough to cause it. Make sure you have a popular torrents (~1000+ peers). It was no effort at all to "break" the DL limit. with the UL limit - it was more "difficult" to see it on the speed graph, but you could see it easily with an external tool. I guess we can count on the the report you had in the 1.8.3 thread that with TCP it performed good, but you are more interested in uTP , right ? ... I can only point out one more thing, that in my case - I am behind a NAT and had to change the external IP with my ISP ( actually switch to another ISP) a few times during the download. Maybe it is related.good luck! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hharis Posted April 3, 2009 Report Share Posted April 3, 2009 last night with new 14981 i set net.calc_overhead to false;uploads are good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted April 3, 2009 Report Share Posted April 3, 2009 hharis:last night with new 14981 i set net.calc_overhead to false;uploads are good.Yes, same here... I think you are on to something... here is what I get with one torrent downloading:When I start a torrent DL with calc_overhead - true - DL limiter fail to work correctly (also if I turn it off afterwords). Only when I turn it to false AND ONLY then start the torrent - it works... Pay attention also to the fact that the UL shows a big overhead and drops almost the full 10K I allocated when the DL is only 50K ... edit: also - with trans_disposition = 5 - all is well... so, as expected, it's the new code that should be blamed... By rafi_d Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hharis Posted April 3, 2009 Report Share Posted April 3, 2009 glad to help...its still cca 20% slower dawnload with 1.9 14981 then with 1.8.3 14984.but there are not so many 1.9 useres. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaguraa Posted April 3, 2009 Report Share Posted April 3, 2009 same problem with upload limit... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freddyboy1 Posted April 3, 2009 Report Share Posted April 3, 2009 Using 1.9 14981.For the bt.transp_disposition setting.1 - outgoing TCP2 - outgoing uTP4 - incoming TCP8 - incoming uTPSpecific combinations:255 - both TCP and uTP, incoming + outgoing (future-proof setting, always will mean this)15 - both TCP and uTP, incoming + outgoing (default)Right ?So if I use 28 in the bt.transp_disposition setting, I should only get uTP connections, right ? When I'm using 28, I get uTP AND TCP connections... To get only uTP, I have to set it to 10. What I'm I doing wrong ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ver Greeneyes Posted April 3, 2009 Report Share Posted April 3, 2009 It's a bitfield, that means you have to add them. So to get TCP only you use 1 + 4 = 5, to get uTP only you use 8 + 2 = 10, et cetera. 255 just happens to include all of them - if you used 254, you wouldn't get outgoing TCP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arvid Posted April 3, 2009 Report Share Posted April 3, 2009 @rafi Thanks a lot! I managed to reproduce this. It was connected to a recent change in 1.9 and should not affect 1.8.3. It will be fixed in the next 1.9 alpha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafi Posted April 4, 2009 Report Share Posted April 4, 2009 no problem. so, should we better use 1.8.3 for now? or it's kind of a single-quick-fix/alpha in the 1.9x tree here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.