pinolallo
-
Posts
3 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Downloads
Events
Blogs
Store
Posts posted by pinolallo
-
-
dear nTorrent developers, I'm running the largest italian bittorrent community (a village), and we have a problem.
The problem is BitComet. But The solution is not nTorrent because is still missing the udp protocol.
So I'm seriosly thinking about a BitComet tracker wide ban, this because this shity client (also in version 6.3) flood the tracker, distrupt first release superseed launches, announces itself as a new peer entry and many (too many) other nasty things. But for many reasons is an essential need for our community that a client use also udp protocol. nTorrent does not.
I hoped that 1.5 version implemented udp (like azu and BC).
So the question is, UDP protocol will be implemented? There is a beta version where we can help testing the UDP protocol?
Thanks you for writing the definitive BC killer.
µTorrent 1.5 released
in Announcements
Posted
About UDP protocol on tracker:
this in the connection status of the server
pinolallo@xxxxx# netstat -nap tcp | wc -l
10298
pinolallo@xxxxxx# netstat -nap udp | wc -l
7
You will say: but why are asking for udp protol if the connections status for udp has a 1000 times less impact against tcp?
Because effectively the tracker udp traffic is the 33% of the total tracker traffic but has a evident very less impact on the system than tcp/protocol
here the stats of a 6 min of tracker trafic announces monitoring
tcp announces 37588
udp announces 12715
percentile udp/tcp announce ratios ratio 33,8272853
announces/sec 139,73
think about that the tracker respond to a 151 announce+scrape/sec
In my opinion there is a large payoff about udp tracker protocol that should be considered beside the opinion of a "brainDead" protocol spec.