napouser
-
Posts
66 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Downloads
Events
Blogs
Store
Posts posted by napouser
-
-
this is fantantic
this is moar revolution since napster
-
"[2013-07-26 17:58:29] Error contacting WebUI proxy service: connection closed by peer
"
utorrent remote doesnt work
-
The thread that i am using exist to report issues not for u to learn the basics of allocation and how to use utorrent. If u have a question unrelated u can send a private msg instead of creating long discussion that eventually derail the point
I think that after ~ seven years of running uTorrent I am a little way past needing to ask about the basics of pre-allocation.
So no reason to keep this going
-
also why u asking a question that has no relation to the thread or the problem discribed here?
Because this is the thread that you are using' date=' and of course you do realise that 3.4 is an [b']alpha build so is going to have many and varied problems!!!!!
The thread that i am using exist to report issues not for u to learn the basics of allocation and how to use utorrent. If u have a question unrelated u can send a private msg instead of creating long discussion that eventually derail the point
Also i dont think there is a reason when u dont know something to answer the obvius about the alpha status wich is something everyone who bothered to look for this thread already knows
-
no
in every other version of utorrent u can stop the process and the program automatically checks the next torrent
and u can easily delete the data or move them or safely dismount it with chkdsk
Why would you want to stop a process that is checking data integrity?
becauze the torrent is huge and u want to check an other first so u can start using the connection earlier
becauze u realize u need to change data location first due to disk size
becauze u realize u need to change data location first due to disk integrity bad sector issues
becauze data have been changed in the meantime and u wanna start the procedure again
becauze u can
also why u asking a question that has no relation to the thread or the problem discribed here?
-
the issue is that the program locks the torrent until u check the rest of them
stop command is not working only pause
That's because hashsum checking is ESSENTIAL to prevent data corruption therefore has THE highest priority.
no
in every other version of utorrent u can stop the process and the program automatically checks the next torrent
and u can easily delete the data or move them or safely dismount it with chkdsk
in this one u cant only pause
pause still has the files locked wich means u have to terminate the process in order to delete them
also when u have them on pause and u delete or change location in something else the program for some reason automatically resumes the paused one and in the next round it will continue the checking wich means disaster especially if its a large one
-
also an other possible bug
[2013-07-24 00:36:53] IO Error:1168 line:66 align:-99 pos:-99 count:16422764 actual:0
[2013-07-24 00:36:54] IO Error:13 line:203 align:-99 pos:160590446592 count:32768 actual:-99
terribly slows down disc and lags the program for half minute every 10 secs
has to do with big files torrent but i am not sure and as sure as hell dont wanna reproduce it since i lost 3 days of downloading to finally get rid of it
-
(wich will take 0 secs since there is no data)
Turn off pre-allocate so uTorrent doesn't actually create the files BEFORE they start to download
why should i have pre-allocate files ?
sparce files is the way to go
this has nothing to do with allocation
the issue is that the program locks the torrent until u check the rest of them
stop command is not working only pause
and that brings and other bug when u remove a checking torrent or change location of it the paused torrent resumes automatically without notice slowing the system terribly once again
-
cannot change name in torrent list only put a new one when clicking them in list
very annoying bug after crashes when u need to check 500gb of data : cannot stop checking procedure only pause it
therefore u cant change dowload location and restart checking precedure (wich will take 0 secs since there is no data)
-
very annoying bug
some times even with low speeds (30-50kb) lan speed is terrible
spiky and going from 1-3mb/sec and some times less instead of the nomal 10mb/sec
-
Why do you think that "force starting" is not already made to be 'easy' to do??
Do you not consider that if force starting jobs was such a 'good' idea it WOULD BE more obvious/accessible already.
will u stop bothering the thread with a useless discussion that nobody cares?
do u honestly think that i am doing this for 7 years and more than 5000 torrents for no reason
-
So basically you are saying that you want to 'micro-manage' a process that should be left alone to just work.
the exact opposite
i want an option that allows me to set double click to force start
so i dont need to micro manage but set every torrent easy
-
uTorrent will ONLY stop them if that is what your settings tell it to do.managing them myself than having utorrent stopping them wich is unnaceptableyes i understand that is the idea but depending on bandwith and in certain occasion when i have too many of them then i have to raise limit of dloading torrents way too high
as i said force start is a matter of security and has nothing to do with this thread whether its right for some1 to use it instead of managing the normal start
the point of this discussion is that the program gets the option for users that prefer the use force start frequently to get double click to force start instead of start setting not to convince me about my 7 year old settings
-
new bug
every torrent when completed sends this
"[2013-07-18 09:43:06] Could not move data to completed download folder. Error: [0x20]"
data are moved tho and they seem ok
-
here are people that dont want to complicate things by setting up orders or priorities
Nothing to do with queue order OR priorities' date=' but if you HAVE to force start every jobs you are running more jobs than your settings allow for.
Absolutely and totally WRONG.so if u dont want to risk utorrent prioritize/pause ur torrent due to internal priority management force is the way to goBy "force starting" every job you are running your client in THE MOST inefficient way you possibly could. You are bypassing ALL the settings that allow the BitTorrent client to serve data to peers efficiently, however; It IS your bandwidth and computer resources that you are wasting.
it is better to have them running inefficiently by managing them myself than having utorrent stopping them wich is unnaceptable
-
Then get your queue setting right instead of force starting the jobs!i have to force start iti dont think i ever just started anything cauze i want all of them up at all times no matter what
so its pretty pointless would rather turn double click to force-start
no
there are people that dont want to complicate things by setting up orders or priorities they just want to run torrents and keep them running no matter what. so if u dont want to risk utorrent prioritize/pause ur torrent due to internal priority management force is the way to go
-
instead of remove pause button.you should remove stop button.when user will click on start button.then start button will change into stop button.again user will click on stop button it will change into start button.
in short term one button should have multiple work.
Thats a terrible idea
There are millions of times where the programs bug when u make selections
U choose those 3 torrents and u see info about some other 2
There are cases where torrents are paused and program thinking they are stopped
This less functionality for the user will definetaly cauze issues and the last thing i want is to restart client since i need to measure large times of uptime (month+)
now that u mention it a very good idea would be an option to automatically force torrents
its been 7 years that i use this program and everytime i start a torrent i have to force start it
i dont think i ever just started anything cauze i want all of them up at all times no matter what
so its pretty pointless would rather turn double click to force-start
-
BitTorrent clients connect to themselves on a regular basis, you may not need the data retrieved but uTorrent does.
hense why i report it here there is no need and even if it happens there is no need for users to get confused about the health of the torrent
-
Nothing particularly unusual there.For example i am connected to myself 8 timescauze i definetaly need data i already have huh
also it gives a misinterpretation of what i can get from peers of that number when in fact i get nothing
-
Peer list has several peer wrong
For example i am connected to myself 8 times
-
1) cannot stop checking data for a torrent unless u pause
very annoying bug that doesnt allow u to manage easy like it was before what torrent to check and what not
2) dump memory info results in message "utorrent crashed"
3)cannot update app with the normal help/update function
stuck at updating for ever
4) cannot limit total bandwith properly
for example set total upload limit to 85k for a 1mbit connection results to reduce up/down speed to 0
u have to individually set each torrent speed depending on how many u got lets say 10 torrents 5k each to keep connection in proper condition
plz fix
-
byg
sidebar
label list
all lists have (1) even with lots of torrents
-
have asked for this before but probly nobody saw it
plz add option to wrap text in log tab
with huge directories it becomes hard to organize spam msgs
thanks
-
wierd enough 3.4 alpha doesnt have the lag issues 3.3x has
plz help me i dont wanna use alpha versions...
µTorrent 3.4 RC
in Announcements
Posted
I have the remote connectivity issue too