Doc Emmet Brown Posted September 12, 2013 Report Share Posted September 12, 2013 Hi there Reinstalled my Win7 more than 2 years ago. Installed last version of uT by that time. Used and installed automatic updates only since then (actual version in use: 3.3.1.30017). Hadn't performed any uninstall/reinstall either.About 6 months ago (maybe more), "cache reading" stats (dark red line) in "Bytes Read - Time" graph started to show 0 activity. "Number of Reads - Time" (top right) graph was showing both "cache reading" and "file reading" stats properly. Since one of the last/two updates, "Number of Reads - Time" graph stopped to show "cache reading" stats (dark red line) also :/Not sure if a clean install would help. Decided to ask first. Thanks in advance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
javacatpaul Posted October 22, 2013 Report Share Posted October 22, 2013 This problem with the graph display persists in 3.3.2.30180 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Emmet Brown Posted October 27, 2013 Author Report Share Posted October 27, 2013 Solved the prob downgrading to 2.2.1: halved file reads (!), much better memory management (under Win7 at least), graphs displays all stats correctly... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snakeonen Posted November 6, 2013 Report Share Posted November 6, 2013 I find the same problem, the cache reading line (dark red line) doesn't display in 3.3.2 build 30260 (the newest stable version), but in 2.0.4 build 22967 (or 2.2.1) and 3.4 Beta build 30304 the line displays normally, there are three pictures:μTorrent 2.0.4 build 22967:μTorrent 3.3.2 build 30260 (the cache reading line (dark red line) doesn't display, the file reading line displays well):μTorrent 3.4 Beta build 30304: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Emmet Brown Posted November 7, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 7, 2013 Hm, looks like they "improved" ( ) caching and corrected those graphs. Thanks for the heads up. Will try stable 3.4 build later then, let's see if it will perform better than 2.2.1.PD: that 2.0.4 caching is really bad lookin' :/ Too many reads from file. 2.2.1 is much better IMO (check "reads from cache" vs. "reads from file" ratio) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.